Peri- and Postoperative Outcomes of Outpatient vs Inpatient Laparoscopic Apical Prolapse Repair

被引:2
作者
Ajao, Mobolaji O. [1 ]
Gu, Xiangmei [1 ]
Kohli, Neeraj [2 ]
Einarsson, Jon I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Minimally Invas Gynecol Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Boston Urogynecol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Sacrocolpopexy; Laparoscopy; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; HYSTERECTOMY; FEASIBILITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To assess the feasibility of outpatient laparoscopic management of apical pelvic organ prolapse along with indicated vaginal repairs and anti-incontinence procedures. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic center, Boston, MA. Patients: Total of 112 patients seen in the minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and urogynecology clinics with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Interventions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy, sacrocervico- or sacrocolpopexy along with vaginal prolapse and anti-incontinence procedures as indicated from 2013 to 2017 at Brigham & Women's Hospital and Brigham & Women's Faulkner Hospital performed by a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and urogynecology team. Measurements and Main Results: Of the 112 patients, 52 were outpatient and 60 were admitted (median stay in admission group = 1 day; range 1-3). Patient baseline characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists' class, and pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage were similar between the outpatient and admitted cohorts. Most patients underwent hysterectomy at the time of the sacropexy (65.4% outpatient vs 73.3% admitted, p=.08). Concomitant apical prolapse repair was more common in the outpatient group (98.1% vs 85%, p=.02). The proportion of outpatient procedures increased from 17% in 2013 to a peak of 70% in 2016. Operating room time was shorter for the outpatient cohort (103.9 minutes vs 115.5 minutes, p=.04), but other perioperative outcomes were similar. There were no intraoperative complications. The numbers of postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperations were low and similar between outpatient and admitted cohorts. No factor was predictive of admission on regression analysis. Conclusion: Laparoscopic apical prolapse repair with concomitant vaginal repairs can be performed safely as an outpatient procedure. A unique team approach may foster a shorter, more efficient procedure without compromising short-term outcomes. (C) 2020 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1513
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease [J].
Aarts, Johanna W. M. ;
Nieboer, Theodoor E. ;
Johnson, Neil ;
Tavender, Emma ;
Garry, Ray ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Kluivers, Kirsten B. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (08)
[2]   Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (vol 123, pg 5, 2014) [J].
Anger, J. T. ;
Mueller, E. R. ;
Tarnay, C. ;
Smith, B. ;
Stroupe, K. ;
Rosenman, A. ;
Brubaker, L. ;
Bresee, C. ;
Kenton, K. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (01) :165-165
[3]  
Biler A, 2018, INT BRAZ J UROL, V44, P994, DOI [10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2017.0692, 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0692]
[4]   Outpatient Hysterectomy Volume in the United States [J].
Cohen, Sarah L. ;
Ajao, Mobolaji O. ;
Clark, Nisse V. ;
Vitonis, Allison F. ;
Einarsson, Jon I. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 130 (01) :130-137
[5]   Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Coolen, Anne-Lotte W. M. ;
van Oudheusden, Anique M. J. ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
van Eijndhoven, Hugo W. F. ;
Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R. ;
Bongers, Marlies Y. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (10) :1469-1479
[6]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[7]   A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study [J].
Freeman, R. M. ;
Pantazis, K. ;
Thomson, A. ;
Frappell, J. ;
Bombieri, L. ;
Moran, P. ;
Slack, M. ;
Scott, P. ;
Waterfield, M. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (03) :377-384
[8]   Short-Term Outcomes of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared With Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Siddiqui, Nazenza Y. ;
Wu, Jennifer M. ;
Visco, Anthony G. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (06) :1201-1206
[9]   Same-Day Discharge After Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy [J].
Kisby, Cassandra K. ;
Polin, Michael R. ;
Visco, Anthony G. ;
Siddiqui, Nazema Y. .
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (05) :337-341
[10]   A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences [J].
Klauschie, Jennifer L. ;
Suozzi, Brent A. ;
O'Brien, Maureen M. ;
McBride, Andrew W. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (03) :273-279