Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival

被引:49
作者
Meraj, Perwaiz M. [1 ]
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Schreiber, Theodore [2 ]
Maini, Brijeshwar [3 ]
O'Neill, William W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Dept Cardiol, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[2] Detroit Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Charles E Schmidt Coll Med, Dept Intervent Cardiol & Transcatheter Therapy, Delray Beach, FL USA
[4] Henry Ford Med Ctr, Dept Intervent Cardiol & Struct Heart, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; anoxic brain injury; cardiogenic shock; Impella; 2.5; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); unprotected left main coronary artery; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; INTRAAORTIC BALLOON COUNTERPULSATION; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; TOTAL OCCLUSION; ARTERY; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; HEART; REVASCULARIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/joic.12377
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess post-procedural outcomes when Impella 2.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) support is initiated either prior to or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) culprit lesion in the context of acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Background: Initiation of Impella 2.5 pLVAD prior to PCI is associated with significant survival benefit in the setting of AMICS. Outcomes of those presenting with a ULMCA culprit lesion in this setting have not been well characterized. Methods: Thirty-six consecutive patients in the cVAD Registry supported with Impella 2.5 pLVAD for AMICS who underwent PCI on ULMCA culprit lesion were included in our multicenter study. Results: The average age was 69.8 +/- 14.2 years, 77.8% were male, 72.7% were in CS at admission, 44.4% sustained one or multiple cardiac arrests, and 30.6% had anoxic brain injury. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the Pre-PCI group (n = 20) and Post-PCI group (n = 16). Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and greater coronary disease burden were significantly more frequent in the Pre-PCI group but they had significantly better survival to discharge (55.0% vs 18.8%, P = 0.041). Kaplan-Meier 30-day survival analysis showed very poor survival in Post-PCI group (48.1% vs 12.5%, Log-Rank P = 0.004). Conclusions: Initiation of Impella 2.5 pLVAD prior to as compared with after PCI of ULMCA for AMICS culprit lesion is associated with significant early survival. As previously described, patients supported after PCI appear to have very poor survival at 30 days.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 263
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Babaev, A
    Frederick, PD
    Pasta, DJ
    Every, N
    Sichrovsky, T
    Hochman, JS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04): : 448 - 454
  • [2] Incidence of Hemolysis in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Treated with Impella Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Badiye, Amit P.
    Hernandez, Gabriel A.
    Novoa, Italo
    Chaparro, Sandra V.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2016, 62 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [3] Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock
    Basir, Mir B.
    Schreiber, Theodore L.
    Grines, Cindy L.
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Maini, Brijeshwar S.
    Khandelwal, Akshay K.
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (06) : 845 - 851
  • [4] Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis in the United States
    Brennan, J. Matthew
    Dai, David
    Patel, Manesh R.
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Armstrong, Ehrin J.
    Messenger, John C.
    Curtis, Jeptha P.
    Shunk, Kendrick A.
    Anstrom, Kevin J.
    Eisenstein, Eric L.
    Weintraub, William S.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Douglas, Pamela S.
    Hillegass, William B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (07) : 648 - 654
  • [5] Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction secondary to acute left main coronary occlusion in an institution without on-site cardiothoracic surgical support
    Chia, Pow-Li
    Khoo, Brian-Chung-Hoe
    Ng, Chee-Keong
    Lim, Jimmy-Tien-Wei
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2009, 4 (05) : 617 - 619
  • [6] Corstiaan A, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9
  • [7] Outcome in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction due to left main coronary artery occlusion
    De Luca, G
    Suryapranata, H
    Thomas, K
    van't Hof, AWJ
    de Boer, MJ
    Hoorntje, JCA
    Zijlstra, F
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 91 (02) : 235 - +
  • [8] DEFEYTER PMJ, 1984, AM J CARDIOL, V53, P1727
  • [9] A Prospective Feasibility Trial Investigating the Use of the Impel la 2.5 System in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (The PROTECT I Trial) Initial US Experience
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Henriques, Jose P. S.
    Mauri, Laura
    Sjauw, Krischan
    Civitello, Andrew
    Kar, Biswajit
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Resnic, Frederic S.
    Teirstein, Paul
    Makkar, Raj
    Palacios, Igor F.
    Collins, Michael
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Benali, Karim
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 2 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [10] Sudden adult death syndrome and other non-ischaemic causes of sudden cardiac death
    Fabre, A
    Sheppard, MN
    [J]. HEART, 2006, 92 (03) : 316 - 320