Physics-informed machine learning modeling for predictive control using noisy data

被引:32
作者
Alhajeri, Mohammed S. [1 ,3 ]
Abdullah, Fahim [1 ]
Wu, Zhe [4 ]
Christofides, Panagiotis D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Kuwait Univ, Dept Chem Engn, POB 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Singapore 117585, Singapore
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Process control; Model predictive control; Nonlinear processes; Machine Learning; Recurrent neural networks; Aspen Plus Dynamics; STATE ESTIMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2022.07.035
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Due to the occurrence of over-fitting at the learning phase, the modeling of chemical processes via artificial neural networks (ANN) by using corrupted data (i.e., noisy data) is an ongoing challenge. Therefore, this work investigates the effect of both Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise on the performance of process-structure based recurrent neural networks (RNN) models, which take the form of partially-connected RNN models in this work, that are used to approximate a class of multi-input-multi-outputs nonlinear sys-tems. Furthermore, two different techniques, specifically Monte Carlo dropout and co -teaching, are utilized in the development of partially-connected RNN models. These two techniques are employed to reduce the over-fitting in ANNs when noisy data is used in the training process and, hence, to improve the open-loop accuracy as well as the closed-loop performance under a Lyapunov-based model predictive controller (MPC). Aspen Plus Dynamics, a well-known high-fidelity process simulator, is used to simulate a large-scale chemical process application in order to demonstrate the anticipated improvements in both open-loop approximation and closed-loop controller performance in the presence of Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise in the data set using physics-informed RNNs.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 49
页数:16
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Handling noisy data in sparse model identification using subsampling and co-teaching
    Abdullah, Fahim
    Wu, Zhe
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 157
  • [2] 110th Anniversary: Ensemble-Based Machine Learning for Industrial Fermenter Classification and Foaming Control
    Agarwal, Aman
    Liu, Y. A.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (36) : 16719 - 16729
  • [3] Process structure-based recurrent neural network modeling for predictive control: A comparative study
    Alhajeri, Mohammed S.
    Luo, Junwei
    Wu, Zhe
    Albalawi, Fahad
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2022, 179 : 77 - 89
  • [4] Machine-learning-based state estimation and predictive control of nonlinear processes
    Alhajeri, Mohammed S.
    Wu, Zhe
    Rincon, David
    Albalawi, Fahad
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2021, 167 : 268 - 280
  • [5] Machinelearning-baseddistributed model predictive control of nonlinear processes
    Chen, Scarlett
    Wu, Zhe
    Rincon, David
    Christofides, Panagiotis D.
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (11)
  • [6] Approximate model predictive building control via machine learning
    Drgona, Jan
    Picard, Damien
    Kvasnica, Michal
    Helsen, Lieve
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 218 : 199 - 216
  • [7] Gal Y, 2016, ADV NEUR IN, V29
  • [8] Gal Y, 2016, PR MACH LEARN RES, V48
  • [9] Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels
    Han, Bo
    Yao, Quanming
    Yu, Xingrui
    Niu, Gang
    Xu, Miao
    Hu, Weihua
    Tsang, Ivor W.
    Sugiyama, Masashi
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 31 (NIPS 2018), 2018, 31
  • [10] A Wiener-type recurrent neural network and its control strategy for nonlinear dynamic applications
    Hsu, Yu-Liang
    Wang, Jeen-Shing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2009, 19 (06) : 942 - 953