Expanding cities and vehicle use in India: Differing impacts of built environment factors on scooter and car use in Mumbai

被引:26
作者
Shirgaokar, Manish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
built environment; car; motorised two-wheeler; South and Southeast Asia; vehicle use; SELF-SELECTION; RESIDENTIAL CHOICE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; MEXICO-CITY; MODE CHOICE; OWNERSHIP; RESTRICTIONS; COMMUTE; VMT;
D O I
10.1177/0042098015608050
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Expanding urban populations are inducing development at the edges of Indian cities, given the constraints on land use intensification within municipal boundaries. Existing peripheral towns are becoming anchors for this new growth, creating urban agglomerations. Such areas have become preferred home locations for the working poor and emergent middle class, groups that are often priced out of the urban housing market. However, many such exurban locations lack infrastructure such as durable paved roads and transit, because investments are largely clustered within municipal boundaries. This paper focuses on the Greater Mumbai Region and relies on a cross-sectional household travel survey data set. The objective is to understand how vehicle use is linked to the built environment and socio-economics. Spatial analysis shows that cars are used in urban centres while scooters and motorcycles are used in the exurbs. Estimated censored regression models show that greater household distance from the main employment centre Nariman Point, better job accessibility and improved socio-economic factors increase vehicle use, while land use diversity and density bring down vehicle use. A key econometric result is that after controlling for location, land use, infrastructure supply and socio-economics, the expectation of a motorised two-wheeler or car in a household does not translate to its use. Overall, the findings suggest that policies encouraging higher land use diversity, density and transit supply have the potential to marginally decrease vehicle use in the Indian metropolis. However, future research needs to focus on residential location to better understand how the choices of where to live and how to travel are interconnected.
引用
收藏
页码:3296 / 3316
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States [J].
Bento, AM ;
Cropper, ML ;
Mobarak, AM ;
Vinha, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2005, 87 (03) :466-478
[2]   Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs [J].
Bertaud, A ;
Brueckner, JK .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2005, 35 (02) :109-125
[3]  
Bhagat R, 2013, WORKING PAPER SERIES
[4]   A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels [J].
Bhat, Chandra R. ;
Guo, Jessica Y. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2007, 41 (05) :506-526
[5]   A vehicle ownership and utilization choice model with endogenous residential density [J].
Brownstone, David ;
Fang, Hao .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, 2014, 7 (02) :135-151
[6]   Measuring welfare gains from relaxation of land-use restrictions: The case of India's building-height limits [J].
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Sridhar, Kala Seetharam .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2012, 42 (06) :1061-1067
[7]   Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings [J].
Cao, Xinyu ;
Mokhtarian, Patricia L. ;
Handy, Susan L. .
TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2009, 29 (03) :359-395
[8]   Transit-oriented development's ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies [J].
Cervero, Robert .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2007, 39 (09) :2068-2085
[9]   Effects of built environments on vehicle miles traveled: evidence from 370 US urbanized areas [J].
Cervero, Robert ;
Murakami, Jin .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2010, 42 (02) :400-418
[10]   Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: evidence using new data and methods [J].
Chatman, Daniel G. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2009, 41 (05) :1072-1089