Magnetic exposure improves tolerance of fig 'Sabz' explants to drought stress induced in vitro

被引:31
作者
Karimi, Soheil [1 ]
Hojati, Shadi [2 ]
Eshghi, Saeid [2 ]
Moghaddam, Rahim Nazary [3 ]
Jandoust, Samira [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Dept Hort Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Hort Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Hort Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Magnetic field; Drought stress; Polyethylene glycol 6000; Proline; Ficus carica L; CELL-MEMBRANE STABILITY; WATER-STRESS; LEAF-AREA; PROLINE; GROWTH; L; RESPONSES; ANTIOXIDANT; GERMINATION; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2012.01.018
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Common fig (Ficus carica L.) is one of the most important horticultural crops in arid and semi-arid areas around the world. In order to study the response of fig 'Sabz' to drought stress, an in vitro experiment was designed. Treatments included three concentrations of polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG) 0, 3, and 6% (w/v). We also examined the possible protective effects of a static magnetic field (MF) on the fig explants against the drought conditions. The nodal explants of fig were exposed to different durations of MF (0, 15, 30, and 60 min), everyday. The results of the investigation showed that adding PEG to the media, reduced water absorbance, membrane stability index, and growth indices of the explains, whereas PEG resulted in more proline accumulation in the leaves of fig explants. With regard to above-mentioned parameters. PEG at concentration of 6% was more effective. Magnetic treatments reduced the harmful effects of PEG, and the best results were obtained with 15-min magnetic treatment. MF treatments also enhanced proline accumulation in the leaves. In conclusion, MF treatments for short durations may help plants to tolerate drought stress by absorbing more water, accumulating more proline in their leaves, and increasing the thickness of their leaves. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 99
页数:5
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Aazami MA, 2010, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V9, P4014
  • [2] Atak Cimen, 2003, Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology, V2, P113
  • [3] Atak Q, 2007, BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ, V21, P166
  • [4] Comparative dehydration tolerance of foliage of several ornamental crops
    Augé, RM
    Stodola, AJW
    Moore, JL
    Klingeman, WE
    Duan, XR
    [J]. SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2003, 98 (04) : 511 - 516
  • [5] The use of the electrolyte leakage method for assessing cell membrane stability as a water stress tolerance test in durum wheat
    Bajji, M
    Kinet, JM
    Lutts, S
    [J]. PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2002, 36 (01) : 61 - 70
  • [6] RAPID DETERMINATION OF FREE PROLINE FOR WATER-STRESS STUDIES
    BATES, LS
    WALDREN, RP
    TEARE, ID
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 1973, 39 (01) : 205 - 207
  • [7] Bellinger Y., 1987, Plant Physiol. (Life Sci. Adv.), V6, P23
  • [8] CELL-MEMBRANE STABILITY AS A MEASURE OF DROUGHT AND HEAT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT
    BLUM, A
    EBERCON, A
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 1981, 21 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [9] Stimulation of germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by a static magnetic field
    Carbonell, MV
    Martinez, E
    Amaya, JM
    [J]. ELECTRO- AND MAGNETOBIOLOGY, 2000, 19 (01): : 121 - 128
  • [10] Dragiiska Rumiana, 1996, Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, V22, P30