Abiotic Characterization of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta f. fario) and Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Spawning Redds Affected by Small Hydropower Plants Case Studies from Austria

被引:4
作者
Obruca, W. [1 ]
Hauer, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna, Dept Water Atmosphere Environm, IWHW Inst Water Management Hydrol & Hydraul Engn, BOKU, Muthgasse 107, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
spawning habitats; rainbow trout; brown trout; small hydropower plants; management options; ATLANTIC SALMON; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; SITE SELECTION; HABITAT; RIVER; CRITERIA; STREAMS;
D O I
10.1002/rra.3038
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Salmonid rivers in Austria are considerably regulated by small hydropower facilities, resulting in potential declines of the spawning habitats of salmonids. To assess the restrictions and possible quality of hydropower-influenced river sections for salmonid, spawning redd densities of brown trout and rainbow trout were monitored in two rivers in 2014 and 2015. The results showed spawning close to small hydropower facilities for both investigated species with similarities in redd characteristics like pit and tail length. Differences occurred concerning the distance of redd construction to the next shore. Brown trout spawn close to the banks in comparison to rainbow trout which use the entire active channel width. In addition to the preference of brown trout for certain cover types, it turned out that the presence of high quality spawning gravel in the river is the dictating abiotic variable (probably bottleneck) in the control of salmonid populations even for river reaches impacted by small hydropower plants. Moreover, the assessments of spawning redd densities enabled a discussion of different opportunities for spawning habitat enhancement of salmonids in river sections regulated by small hydropower facilities. Here, in conclusion, it was found that the fill-up of the backwater sites by transported sediments or the structural modification (e.g. boulder placement) in the tail of the backwater could improve the spawning situation in a sustainable way. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1989 / 1995
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, KW KORRESPONDENZ WAS, DOI DOI 10.3243/KWE2013.04.002
[2]   Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams [J].
Armstrong, JD ;
Kemp, PS ;
Kennedy, GJA ;
Ladle, M ;
Milner, NJ .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2003, 62 (02) :143-170
[3]  
Bjornn T.C., 1991, American Fisheries Society Special Publication, P83
[4]  
Crisp D. Trevor, 1993, Freshwater Forum, V3, P176
[5]  
Elliott J M., 1994, Quantitative Ecology and the Brown Trout, P286
[6]   REDD SITE SELECTION BY BROWN TROUT IN DOUGLAS CREEK, WYOMING [J].
GROST, RT ;
HUBERT, WA ;
WESCHE, TA .
JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 1990, 5 (03) :365-371
[7]  
Guzelj M., 2014, THESIS, P145
[8]   Review of hydro-morphological management criteria on a river basin scale for preservation and restoration of freshwater pearl mussel habitats [J].
Hauer, C. .
LIMNOLOGICA, 2015, 50 :40-53
[9]   Effects of stream channel morphology, transport processes and effective discharge on salmonid spawning habitats [J].
Hauer, C. ;
Unfer, G. ;
Tritthart, M. ;
Habersack, H. .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2011, 36 (05) :672-685
[10]  
Jungwirth M., 2003, Angewandte Fischokologie an FlieSSgewassern, P547