Combustion Characteristics of Bluff-Body Turbulent Swirling Flames with Coaxial Air Microjet

被引:20
|
作者
Yang, Xiao [1 ]
He, Zhihong [1 ]
Dong, Shikui [1 ]
Tan, Heping [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Energy Sci & Engn, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
RADIATIVE HEAT-TRANSFER; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; GRAY-GASES MODEL; DIFFUSION FLAMES; COMPOSITIONAL STRUCTURE; NONPREMIXED FLAMES; WEIGHTED-SUM; LIQUID FUEL; FLOW-FIELD; METHANE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03048
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The interaction between the coaxial air microjet structure and the swirling flow is investigated numerically based on the nonpremixed bluff body stabilized swirling SM1 flame. The effects of microjet velocity and swirl number on flame combustion characteristics are analyzed. The modified standard k-epsilon model and the realizable k-epsilon model are considered for the turbulent model using FLUENT software. The flamelet model is used with the GRI 2.11 detailed kinetic mechanism. In addition, the discrete ordinate model and the weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model are used together to deal with the radiative heat transfer in the combustion process. Results of the modified standard k-epsilon model are in better agreement with the experimental data than the realizable k-epsilon model. Results show that the inner flame generates due to the existence of a microjet configuration. High microjet velocity (such as 50 m/s) can reduce the soot formation and keep the inner flame high temperature region away from the microjet nozzle. The structure of the inner flame depends on the microjet velocity and is independent of the swirl number. Swirl number increases from 0.3 to 0.6, the primary peak temperature is enhanced by 48 K, and the peak soot volume fraction is increased by 49% along the axis centerline.
引用
收藏
页码:14306 / 14319
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spark ignition of turbulent nonpremixed bluff-body flames
    Ahmed, S. F.
    Balachandran, R.
    Marchione, T.
    Mastorakos, E.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2007, 151 (1-2) : 366 - 385
  • [2] The impact of hydrogen enrichment and bluff-body lip thickness on characteristics of blended propane/hydrogen bluff-body stabilized turbulent diffusion flames
    Kashir, Babak
    Tabejamaat, Sadegh
    Jalalatian, Nafiseh
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 103 : 1 - 13
  • [3] Eulerian particle flamelet modeling for combustion processes of bluff-body stabilized methanol-air turbulent nonpremixed flames
    Kim, Seong-Ku
    Kang, Sungmo
    Kim, Yongmo
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (09) : 1459 - 1474
  • [4] Eulerian particle flamelet modeling for combustion processes of bluff-body stabilized methanol-air turbulent nonpremixed flames
    Seong-Ku Kim
    Sungmo Kang
    Yongmo Kim
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2006, 20 : 1459 - 1474
  • [5] Bluff-body stabilization effects in supersonic turbulent combustion
    Roy, CJ
    Edwards, JR
    CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROCESSES IN COMBUSTION, 1997, : 115 - 118
  • [6] Flow and mixing fields of turbulent bluff-body jets and flames
    Dally, BB
    Fletcher, DF
    Masri, AR
    COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 1998, 2 (02) : 193 - 219
  • [7] AERODYNAMICS OF BLUFF-BODY STABILIZED CONFINED TURBULENT PREMIXED FLAMES
    PAN, JC
    VANGSNESS, MD
    BALLAL, DR
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (04): : 783 - 789
  • [8] COMPARISON OF TURBULENT-JET AND BLUFF-BODY STABILIZED FLAMES
    SCHEFER, RW
    NAMAZIAN, M
    KELLY, J
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 67 (4-6) : 123 - 146
  • [9] Turbulent flame-vortex dynamics of bluff-body premixed flames
    Geikie, Marissa K.
    Rising, Cal J.
    Morales, Anthony J.
    Ahmed, Kareem A.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2021, 223 : 28 - 41
  • [10] Simulations and experiments on the ignition probability in turbulent premixed bluff-body flames
    Sitte, Michael Philip
    Bach, Ellen
    Kariuki, James
    Bauer, Hans-Joerg
    Mastorakos, Epaminondas
    COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2016, 20 (03) : 548 - 565