Life-cycle management of deteriorating civil infrastructure considering resilience to lifetime hazards: A general approach based on renewal-reward processes

被引:69
作者
Yang, David Y. [1 ]
Frangopol, Dan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, ATLSS Engn Res Ctr, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Renewal theory; Resilience; Life-cycle assessment; Life-cycle management; Stochastic modeling; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT; MAINTENANCE; RISK; OPTIMIZATION; COST; PERFORMANCE; BRIDGES; DESIGN; SUSTAINABILITY; DEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Civil infrastructure during its service life is subject to progressive deterioration due to aggressive environments and sudden deterioration due to natural and/or manmade hazards. This paper presents a general approach to perform life-cycle management considering both types of deterioration. As an important aspect of life-cycle asset management under hazards, the present study introduces a novel concept, referred to as lifetime resilience. The lifetime resilience of a deteriorating structure is characterized by its cumulative losses to lifetime hazards. By modeling lifetime hazards and life-cycle performance as renewal-reward processes, the proposed approach resorts to the renewal theory to formulate analytical expressions of expected values of lifetime intervention costs, lifetime failure risks, and lifetime resilience losses. Owing to the efficiency in evaluating these expressions, a generic life-cycle management framework is proposed using multi-objective optimization. This proposed framework is applicable to a wide range of civil infrastructure systems under various types of hazards. The proposed approach is illustrated by using a numerical example.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 212
页数:16
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Computational platform for predicting lifetime system reliability profiles for different structure types in a network [J].
Akgül, F ;
Frangopol, DM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2004, 18 (02) :92-104
[2]   A Decision Support Tool for Sustainable and Resilient Building Design [J].
Alibrandi, Umberto ;
Mosalam, Khalid M. .
RISK AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS: IN HONOR OF PROF. ARMEN DER KIUREGHIAN, 2017, :509-536
[3]   Bridge Scour and Substructure Deterioration: Case Study [J].
Avent, R. Richard ;
Alawady, Mohamed .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2005, 10 (03) :247-254
[4]   Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost [J].
Barone, Giorgio ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2014, 48 :40-50
[5]   Reliability, risk and lifetime distributions as performance indicators for life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures [J].
Barone, Giorgio ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 123 :21-37
[6]   Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: perspectives and review [J].
Basu, Dipanjan ;
Misra, Aditi ;
Puppala, Anand J. .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (01) :96-113
[7]   Life-Cycle Performance of Deteriorating Structural Systems under Uncertainty: Review [J].
Biondini, Fabio ;
Frangopol, Dan M. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (09)
[8]   Seismic resilience of concrete structures under corrosion [J].
Biondini, Fabio ;
Camnasio, Elena ;
Titi, Andrea .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (14) :2445-2466
[9]  
Bocchini P, 2011, P ECCOMAS THEM C COM, P11
[10]   Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Unified Approach [J].
Bocchini, Paolo ;
Frangopol, Dan M. ;
Ummenhofer, Thomas ;
Zinke, Tim .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2014, 20 (02)