Bone setting for prolonged neck pain:: A randomized clinical trial

被引:17
作者
Hemmilä, HM
机构
[1] Folk Med Ctr, Kaustinen 69600, Finland
[2] Tunkkari Hlth Ctr, Veteli, Finland
关键词
manipulation; spinal; randomized controlled trials; complementary therapies; neck pain;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To study the natural history of prolonged neck pain and the effectiveness of bone setting as its treatment. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment and 1-year follow-up was completed. Forty-two working-aged patients with nonspecific neck pain for at least I month and no contraindications to manipulative therapies were recruited. They were randomly allocated into 5 weekly sessions of bone setting provided by 2 experienced folk healers (22 patients) or follow-up without therapy (20 patients). The primary outcomes were neck mobility after the 5-week therapy period and the Million scales modified for neck pain at 5 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline. Secondary outcomes included self-rated improvement and pain drawing at 5 weeks, and 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline, Beck depression scales at 5 weeks and 12 months after baseline, and sick leaves, additional therapies, and pain medication during I year after baseline. Results: At baseline, neck pain was reported constant or increasing by 51% and episodic by 49% of the patients with mean duration of symptoms of 4.3 years for the bone setting and 8.4 years for the control group. Seventy-eight percent of the patients participated in the clinical measurements at 5 weeks, and 90% returned the questionnaires after I year. The cervical mobility of the bone setting patients increased 29% in the frontal, 23% in the sagittal, and 16% in the horizontal plane, whereas the figures for the control group were - 1.4%, 1.0%, and 3.0%, respectively. The mean Million index of the bone setting group (50.6 mm at baseline) was 18.5 mm at 5 weeks, 21.2 mm at 3 months, 22.9 mm at 6 months, and 14.2 mm at 1 year. The figures for the control group were 53.2 mm at baseline, and 4.0, 6.2, 5.4, and 5.5 turn at the corresponding follow-up points. After I year, improvement was reported by 80% of the bone setting and 28% of the control patients. Conclusion: In this study, manual therapy had a measurable effect on the mobility of cervical spine at 5 weeks and an effect on pain that lasted for at least half a year.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 515
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   A randomized clinical trial of manual therapy for cervico-brachial pain syndrome - a pilot study [J].
Allison, GT ;
Nagy, BM ;
Hall, T .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2002, 7 (02) :95-102
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, Spine
[3]   SCREENING DEPRESSED PATIENTS IN FAMILY PRACTICE - RAPID TECHNIQUE [J].
BECK, AT ;
BECK, RW .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1972, 52 (06) :81-&
[4]  
BERGMANN TF, 1993, CHIROPRACTIC TECHNIQ, P1
[5]  
Bogduk Nikolai, 2003, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, V14, P455, DOI 10.1016/S1047-9651(03)00041-X
[6]   Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996 [J].
Borghouts, JAJ ;
Koes, BW ;
Vondeling, H ;
Bouter, LM .
PAIN, 1999, 80 (03) :629-636
[7]   The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review [J].
Borghouts, JAJ ;
Koes, BW ;
Bouter, LM .
PAIN, 1998, 77 (01) :1-13
[8]   Does 'healing' benefit patients with chronic symptoms? A quasi-randomized trial in general practice [J].
Dixon, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1998, 91 (04) :183-188
[9]  
DVORAK J, 1991, MANUAL MED, V6, P117
[10]   MEDICINE IN EUROPE .8. COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN EUROPE [J].
FISHER, P ;
WARD, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) :107-111