An extended cloud analysis method for seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges

被引:5
|
作者
Sfahani, Mohammad Ghalami [1 ]
Guan, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ Gold Coast Campus, Griffith Sch Engn & Built Environm, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia
关键词
fragility curve; highway bridge; Southeast Queensland; seismic hazard; ground motion record; bridge performance level; time-history analysis; failure probability; BEHAVIOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.12989/eas.2018.15.6.605
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this paper, an extended Cloud analysis method is developed for seismic fragility assessment of existing highway bridges in the southeast Queensland region. This method extends the original Cloud analysis dataset by performing scaled Cloud analyses. The original and scaled Cloud datasets are then paired to generate seismic fragility curves. The seismic hazard in this region is critically reviewed, and the ground motion records are selected for the time-history analysis based on various record selection criteria. A parametric highway bridge model is developed in the OpenSees analysis software, and a sampling technique is employed to quantify the uncertainties of highway bridges ubiquitous in this region. Technical recommendations are also given for the seismic performance evaluation of highway bridges in such low-to-moderate seismic zones. Finally, a probabilistic fragility study is conducted by performing a total of 8000 time-history analyses and representative bridge fragility curves are generated. It is illustrated that the seismic fragility curves generated by the proposed extended Cloud analysis method are in close agreement with those which are obtained by the rigorous incremental dynamic analysis method. Also, it reveals that more than 50% of highway bridges existing in southeast Queensland will be damaged subject to a peak ground acceleration of 0.14 g.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 616
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges considering multi-dimensional performance limit state
    Qi’ang Wang
    Ziyan Wu
    Shukui Liu
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 11 : 185 - 193
  • [22] Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges considering multi-dimensional performance limit state
    Wang Qi'ang
    Wu Ziyan
    Liu Shukui
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2012, 11 (02) : 185 - 193
  • [23] Improved Component-Level Deterioration Modeling and Capacity Estimation for Seismic Fragility Assessment of Highway Bridges
    Shekhar, Shivang
    Ghosh, Jayadipta
    ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 7 (04)
  • [25] Analysis of Seismic Fragility Functions of Highway Embankments
    Hubner, Balazs
    Mahler, Andras
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 64 (04): : 1162 - 1169
  • [26] A deep learning-aided seismic fragility analysis method for bridges
    Wang, Mengge
    Zhang, Hao
    Dai, Hongzhe
    Shen, Luming
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 40 : 1056 - 1064
  • [27] Seismic Fragility of Multispan Simply Supported Steel Highway Bridges in New York State. II: Fragility Analysis, Fragility Curves, and Fragility Surfaces
    Pan, Y.
    Agrawal, A. K.
    Ghosn, M.
    Alampalli, S.
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (05) : 462 - 472
  • [28] Effects of Pounding and Skewness on Seismic Responses of Typical Multispan Highway Bridges Using the Fragility Function Method
    Huo, Yili
    Zhang, Jian
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (06) : 499 - 515
  • [29] Seismic fragility assessment of UHPC ribbed arch bridges
    Yan, Banfu
    Lai, Junjiang
    Wu, Suiwen
    Feng, Shipeng
    Meng, Xiangcheng
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 190
  • [30] Seismic fragility assessment of typical bridges in Northeastern Brazil
    Ferreira Cavalcante, Gustavo Henrique
    Vieira Pereira, Eduardo Marques
    Rodrigues, Isabela Durci
    Marcos Vieira Junior, Luiz Carlos
    Padgett, Jamie Ellen
    Siqueira, Gustavo Henrique
    LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 19 (05)