Influence of Vaccination Characteristics on COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Among Working-Age People in Hong Kong, China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:23
作者
Wang, Kailu [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Yau, Peter Sen-Yung [1 ,2 ]
Chung, Vincent Chi-Ho [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Charlene Hoi-Lam [2 ]
Dong, Dong [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan [2 ]
Yeoh, Eng-Kiong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, JC Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ctr Hlth Syst & Policy Res, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, JC Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
COVID-19; vaccine; vaccine hesitancy; quarantine measures; conjoint analysis; discrete choice experiment; peer influence; PREFERENCES; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2021.793533
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Along with individual-level factors, vaccination-related characteristics are important in understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. This study aimed to determine the influence of these characteristics on vaccine acceptance to formulate promotion strategies after considering differences among respondents with different characteristics.Methods: An online discrete choice experiment was conducted among people aged 18-64 years in Hong Kong, China, from 26 to 28 February 2021. Respondents were asked to make choices regarding hypothetical vaccination programmes described by vaccination-related characteristics-the attributes derived from a prior individual interview. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify the differences in vaccination-related characteristics among respondents with different personal characteristics.Results: A total of 1,773 respondents provided valid responses. The vaccine efficacy and brand were the most important factors affecting acceptance, followed by the exemption of quarantine for vaccinated travelers, safety, venue for vaccination, vaccine uptake of people in their lives, and recommendations by general physicians or government. Frequent exposure to vaccination information on social media has been associated with increasing vaccine refusal. Substantial preference heterogeneity for the attributes was found among people of different ages, incomes, chronic conditions, and previous acceptance of influenza vaccines.Conclusion: The findings provided evidence to formulate interventions to promote vaccine uptake, including the provision of vaccination at housing estate or workplaces, involvement of general physicians and interpersonal communication in vaccine promotion and information dissemination, and exemption of quarantine for vaccinated people. Moreover, social media is a significant information channel that cannot be neglected in the dissemination of official information.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [51] Intention of nurses to accept coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination and change of intention to accept seasonal influenza vaccination during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey
    Wang, Kailu
    Wong, Eliza Lai Yi
    Ho, Kin Fai
    Cheung, Annie Wai Ling
    Chan, Emily Ying Yang
    Yeoh, Eng Kiong
    Wong, Samuel Yeung Shan
    [J]. VACCINE, 2020, 38 (45) : 7049 - 7056
  • [52] Too little, too late: social media companies' failure to tackle vaccine misinformation poses a real threat
    Wardle, Claire
    Singerman, Eric
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [53] Social media and vaccine hesitancy
    Wilson, Steven Lloyd
    Wiysonge, Charles
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (10):
  • [54] Views on Workplace Policies and its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life During Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey of Employees
    Wong, Eliza Lai-Yi
    Ho, Kai-Fai
    Wong, Samuel Yeung-Shan
    Cheung, Annie Wai-Ling
    Yau, Peter Sen-Yung
    Dong, Dong
    Yeoh, Eng-Kiong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 11 (03) : 344 - 353
  • [55] The use of the health belief model to assess predictors of intent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and willingness to pay
    Wong, Li Ping
    Alias, Haridah
    Wong, Pooi-Fong
    Lee, Hai Yen
    AbuBakar, Sazaly
    [J]. HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (09) : 2204 - 2214
  • [56] Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the health belief model: A population-based survey in Hong Kong
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Wong, Eliza L. Y.
    Huang, Junjie
    Cheung, Annie W. L.
    Law, Kevin
    Chong, Marc K. C.
    Ng, Rita W. Y.
    Lai, Christopher K. C.
    Boon, Siaw S.
    Lau, Joseph T. F.
    Chen, Zigui
    Chan, Paul K. S.
    [J]. VACCINE, 2021, 39 (07) : 1148 - 1156
  • [57] World Health Organization, 2020, GETT YOUR WORKPL REA
  • [58] Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial
    Wu, Zhiwei
    Hu, Yaling
    Xu, Miao
    Chen, Zhen
    Yang, Wanqi
    Jiang, Zhiwei
    Li, Minjie
    Jin, Hui
    Cui, Guoliang
    Chen, Panpan
    Wang, Lei
    Zhao, Guoqing
    Ding, Yuzhu
    Zhao, Yuliang
    Yin, Weidong
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (06) : 803 - 812
  • [59] Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention
    Wu, Zunyou
    McGoogan, Jennifer M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (13): : 1239 - 1242
  • [60] Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial
    Zhang, Yanjun
    Zeng, Gang
    Pan, Hongxing
    Li, Changgui
    Hu, Yaling
    Chu, Kai
    Han, Weixiao
    Chen, Zhen
    Tang, Rong
    Yin, Weidong
    Chen, Xin
    Hu, Yuansheng
    Liu, Xiaoyong
    Jiang, Congbing
    Li, Jingxin
    Yang, Minnan
    Song, Yan
    Wang, Xiangxi
    Gao, Qiang
    Zhu, Fengcai
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (02) : 181 - 192