Liquidation risk in insurance under contemporary regulatory frameworks

被引:9
作者
Li, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Haibo [2 ,3 ]
Tang, Qihe [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Jinxia [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Math & Stat, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] UNSW Sydney, Sch Risk & Actuarial Studies, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Liquidation; Rehabilitation; The three-barrier model; Solvent and insolvent states; Diffusion; The CEV model; PARISIAN RUIN; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; SYSTEMIC RISK; DEFAULT RISK; BANKRUPTCY; INVERSION; CHAPTER-7; INDUSTRY; EQUITY; TIMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.04.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In traditional research in insurance and finance, a firm is subject to immediate liquidation when its asset value process drops to an absorbing low barrier. This treatment greatly simplifies research but largely ignores the complexity of the liquidation procedure in the real world. In banking and finance, many researchers have taken into account the features of Chapter 7 liquidation and Chapter 11 reorganization of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Also, there have been similar discussions in insurance regulation, but few works have been done to achieve a quantitative understanding of the liquidation risk in insurance under contemporary regulatory frameworks. In this paper, we quantify the rehabilitation proceeding in insurance, which is akin to Chapter 11 reorganization of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, and we conduct a probabilistic analysis of the liquidation risk of an insurance company having the option of rehabilitation. In doing so, we construct a three-barrier model to describe the solvent and insolvent states in which the surplus process follows different time-homogeneous diffusions. We derive analytical expressions for the liquidation probability and the Laplace transform of the liquidation time with a fixed grace period and then extend the study to the case with independent exponentially distributed grace periods. If further restricted to the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) framework, the obtained formulas become completely explicit. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 49
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Acharya VV, 2014, WILEY FINANC SER, P151
[2]   FROM RUIN TO BANKRUPTCY FOR COMPOUND POISSON SURPLUS PROCESSES [J].
Albrecher, Hansjoerg ;
Lautscham, Volkmar .
ASTIN BULLETIN, 2013, 43 (02) :213-243
[3]   The optimal dividend barrier in the Gamma–Omega model [J].
Albrecher H. ;
Gerber H.U. ;
Shiu E.S.W. .
European Actuarial Journal, 2011, 1 (1) :43-55
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Brownian motion and stochastic calculus
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WORKING PAPER
[6]   Optimal capital structure and bankruptcy choice: Dynamic bargaining versus liquidation [J].
Antill, Samuel ;
Grenadier, Steven R. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 133 (01) :198-224
[7]  
Asmussen S., 2010, Ruin Probabilities
[8]   ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE EXCEDENTS OF FUNDS WITH ASSETS AND LIABILITIES IN PRESENCE OF SOLVENCY AND RECOVERY REQUIREMENTS [J].
Avanzi, Benjamin ;
Henriksen, Lars Frederik Brandt ;
Wong, Bernard .
ASTIN BULLETIN, 2018, 48 (02) :647-672
[9]   A dynamic program for valuing corporate securities [J].
Ayadi, Mohamed A. ;
Ben-Ameur, Hatem ;
Fakhfakh, Tarek .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 249 (02) :751-770
[10]  
Biggs JH, 2014, WILEY FINANC SER, P181