Decolonization of Health Care Workers In a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Carrying a Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolate

被引:3
|
作者
Richter, Annika [1 ]
Eder, Ines [2 ]
Koenig, Brigitte [2 ]
Lutze, Bettina [1 ]
Rodloff, Arne C. [2 ]
Thome, Ulrich H. [3 ]
Weiss, Melanie [4 ]
Chaberny, Iris F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Leipzig, Zentrum Infekt Med ZINF, Inst Hyg Krankenhaushygiene & Umweltmed, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Leipzig, ZINF, Inst Med Mikrobiol & Infektionsepidemiol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Leipzig, Abt Neonatol, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Univ Klinikum Leipzig, Zentrale Einrichtung Arbeitsmed & Arbeitssicherhe, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Staphylococcus aureus; staff screening; decolonization; octenidine; mupirocin; neonatology; MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION; REGION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0043-122277
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background In 2016, an increased rate of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus colonization was detected on a neonatal intensive care unit at the Leipzig University Hospital. Typing results showed a predominant spa-type t091. Considering nosocomial clustering, several infection prevention measures (e. g. intensified standard precautions, single-occupancy room, cohorted patients, continuing education of staff) were introduced, including staff screening followed by decolonization of colonized health care workers. Methods Staff members showing positive on screening carried out a 5-day decolonization program at home. Decolonization products containing octenidine as active ingredient were used first. At the earliest, 48 h after completing the procedure, the success of the intervention was tested ( 3 buccal and nasal swabs were taken on consecutive days). If 2 attempts at decolonization were not successful, staff members were provided with a mupirocin-containing nasal ointment instead of octenidine. Results Of 128 employees examined, 43 (33.6 %) were identified as carriers of S. aureus. In 9 cases (20.9 %; 9/ 43) the S. aureus matched with type t091. 2 carriers (4.7 %; 2/43) of MRSA were detected as well. The first decolonization attempt against t091 and MRSA failed altogether. After a second decolonization, 3 cases became negative. Finally, 8 remaining staff members were decolonized successfully with mupirocin containing nasal ointment. Conclusions Various reasons might explain the difficulties of decolonization such as the challenge of managing decolonization at home, inhibitory factors as well as inconsistent performance of decolonization measures. Additionally, differences between the preparations for the nasal decontamination may be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 58
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Molecular epidemiology of meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the neonatal intensive care unit
    Toyama, Y.
    Hisata, K.
    Kasai, Y.
    Nakano, S.
    Komatsu, M.
    Shimizu, T.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2022, 129 : 75 - 81
  • [32] Active Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Sarda, Vanessa
    Molloy, Anne
    Kadkol, Shirahi
    Janda, William M.
    Hershow, Ronald
    McGuinn, Marcella
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 30 (09): : 854 - 860
  • [33] Genomic Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Azarian, Taj
    Maraqa, Nizar F.
    Cook, Robert L.
    Johnson, Judith A.
    Bailey, Christine
    Wheeler, Sarah
    Nolan, David
    Rathore, Mobeen H.
    Morris, J. Glenn, Jr.
    Salemi, Marco
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [34] Active Surveillance Cultures and Decolonization to Reduce Staphylococcus aureus Infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
    Popoola, Victor O.
    Colantuoni, Elizabeth
    Suwantarat, Nuntra
    Pierce, Rebecca
    Carroll, Karen C.
    Aucott, Susan W.
    Milstone, Aaron M.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (04): : 381 - 387
  • [35] Mupirocin for Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization of Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units
    Kotloff, Karen L.
    Shirley, Debbie-Ann T.
    Creech, C. Buddy
    Frey, Sharon E.
    Harrison, Christopher J.
    Staat, Mary
    Anderson, Evan J.
    Dulkerian, Susan
    Thomsen, Isaac P.
    Al-Hosni, Mohamad
    Pahud, Barbara A.
    Bernstein, David I.
    Yi, Jumi
    Petrikin, Joshua E.
    Haberman, Beth
    Stephens, Kathy
    Stephens, Ina
    Oler, Randolph E.
    Conrad, Tom M.
    PEDIATRICS, 2019, 143 (01)
  • [36] Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit
    Haddadin, AS
    Fappiano, SA
    Lipsett, PA
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 78 (921) : 385 - 392
  • [37] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the intensive care unit
    Hardy, KJ
    Hawkey, PM
    Oppenheim, BA
    Gao, F
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (04) : 554P - 554P
  • [38] Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus more contagious than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus in a surgical intensive care unit? (vol 23, pg 491, 2002)
    Vriens
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (10): : 579 - 579
  • [39] Emergence of new strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Healy, CM
    Hulten, KG
    Palazzi, DL
    Campbell, JR
    Baker, CJ
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (10) : 1460 - 1466
  • [40] Containment of a methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit
    Shachor-Meyouhas Y.
    Eluk O.
    Geffen Y.
    Ulanovsky I.
    Smolkin T.
    Blazer S.
    Stein I.
    Kassis I.
    Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2 (Suppl 1) : 491 - 495