How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy

被引:178
作者
Cinelli, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Kadzinski, Milosz [1 ]
Gonzalez, Michael [2 ]
Slowinski, Roman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, Piotrowo 2, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
[2] US EPA, Environm Decis Analyt Branch, Land Remediat & Technol Div, Ctr Environm Solut & Emergency Response,Off Res &, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Syst Res Inst, Newelska 6, PL-01447 Warsaw, Poland
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2020年 / 96卷
关键词
Decision making; Multiple criteria; Taxonomy; Decision support system; MCDA; Method recommendation; EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES; RANKING IRREGULARITIES; ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK; ORDINAL REGRESSION; MULTICRITERIA; SUSTAINABILITY; PREFERENCE; ELECTRE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Decision making is a complex task that involves a multitude of perspectives, constraints, and variables. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a process that has been used for several decades to support decision making. It includes a series of steps that systematically help Decision Maker(s) (DM(s)) and stakeholders in structuring a decision making problem, identifying their preferences, and building a decision recommendation consistent with those preferences. Over the last decades, many studies have demonstrated the conduct of the MCDA process and how to select an MCDA method. Until now, there has not been a review of these studies, nor a proposal of a unified and comprehensive high-level representation of the MCDA process characteristics (i.e., features), which is the goal of this paper. We introduce a review of the research that defines how to conduct the MCDA process, compares MCDA methods, and presents Decision Support Systems (DSSs) to recommend a relevant MCDA method or a subset of methods. We then synthesize this research into a taxonomy of characteristics of the MCDA process, grouped into three main phases, (i) problem formulation, (ii) construction of the decision recommendation, and (iii) qualitative features and technical support. Each of these phases includes a subset of the 10 characteristics that helps the analyst implementing the MCDA process, while also being aware of the implication of these choices at each step. By showing how decision making can be split into manageable and justifiable steps, we reduce the risk of overwhelming the analyst, as well as the DMs/stakeholders during the MCDA process. A questioning strategy is also proposed to demonstrate how to apply the taxonomy to map MCDA methods and select the most relevant one(s) using real case studies. Additionally, we show how the DSSs for MCDA method recommendation can be grouped into three main clusters. This proposal can enhance a traceable and categorizable development of such systems. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [31] Cinelli M, 2018, MCDA INDEX TOOL INTE, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.24321.71529, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.24321.71529]
  • [32] Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment
    Cinelli, Marco
    Coles, Stuart R.
    Kirwan, Kerry
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 : 138 - 148
  • [33] Predictive analytics and disused railways requalification: Insights from a Post Factum Analysis perspective
    Ciomek, Krzysztof
    Ferretti, Valentina
    Kadzinski, Milosz
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2018, 105 : 34 - 51
  • [34] Heuristics for selecting pair-wise elicitation questions in multiple criteria choice problems
    Ciomek, Krzysztof
    Kadzinski, Milosz
    Tervonen, Tommi
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 262 (02) : 693 - 707
  • [35] A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Figueira, Jose Rui
    Greco, Salvatore
    Slowinski, Roman
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 73 : 1 - 17
  • [36] Multiple criteria hierarchy process for sorting problems based on ordinal regression with additive value functions
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Doumpos, Michael
    Greco, Salvatore
    Slowinski, Roman
    Zopounidis, Constantin
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 251 (1-2) : 117 - 139
  • [37] The SMAA-PROMETHEE method
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Figueira, Jose Rui
    Greco, Salvatore
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 239 (02) : 514 - 522
  • [38] Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Kadzinski, Milosz
    Slowinski, Roman
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2013, 93 (2-3) : 381 - 422
  • [39] Supporting the Use of Decision Aiding Methods by Non-specialists
    Costa, Ana Sara
    Rodrigues, Ruben
    Xiang, Andre
    Figueira, Jose Rui
    Borbinha, Jose
    [J]. BUSINESS MODELING AND SOFTWARE DESIGN, BMSD 2019, 2019, 356 : 81 - 94
  • [40] A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
    Deb, K
    Pratap, A
    Agarwal, S
    Meyarivan, T
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) : 182 - 197