How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy

被引:178
作者
Cinelli, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Kadzinski, Milosz [1 ]
Gonzalez, Michael [2 ]
Slowinski, Roman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, Piotrowo 2, PL-60965 Poznan, Poland
[2] US EPA, Environm Decis Analyt Branch, Land Remediat & Technol Div, Ctr Environm Solut & Emergency Response,Off Res &, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[3] Polish Acad Sci, Syst Res Inst, Newelska 6, PL-01447 Warsaw, Poland
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2020年 / 96卷
关键词
Decision making; Multiple criteria; Taxonomy; Decision support system; MCDA; Method recommendation; EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES; RANKING IRREGULARITIES; ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK; ORDINAL REGRESSION; MULTICRITERIA; SUSTAINABILITY; PREFERENCE; ELECTRE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2020.102261
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Decision making is a complex task that involves a multitude of perspectives, constraints, and variables. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a process that has been used for several decades to support decision making. It includes a series of steps that systematically help Decision Maker(s) (DM(s)) and stakeholders in structuring a decision making problem, identifying their preferences, and building a decision recommendation consistent with those preferences. Over the last decades, many studies have demonstrated the conduct of the MCDA process and how to select an MCDA method. Until now, there has not been a review of these studies, nor a proposal of a unified and comprehensive high-level representation of the MCDA process characteristics (i.e., features), which is the goal of this paper. We introduce a review of the research that defines how to conduct the MCDA process, compares MCDA methods, and presents Decision Support Systems (DSSs) to recommend a relevant MCDA method or a subset of methods. We then synthesize this research into a taxonomy of characteristics of the MCDA process, grouped into three main phases, (i) problem formulation, (ii) construction of the decision recommendation, and (iii) qualitative features and technical support. Each of these phases includes a subset of the 10 characteristics that helps the analyst implementing the MCDA process, while also being aware of the implication of these choices at each step. By showing how decision making can be split into manageable and justifiable steps, we reduce the risk of overwhelming the analyst, as well as the DMs/stakeholders during the MCDA process. A questioning strategy is also proposed to demonstrate how to apply the taxonomy to map MCDA methods and select the most relevant one(s) using real case studies. Additionally, we show how the DSSs for MCDA method recommendation can be grouped into three main clusters. This proposal can enhance a traceable and categorizable development of such systems. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 178 条
  • [1] A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects
    Abastante, Francesca
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Lami, Isabella M.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 127 : 109 - 120
  • [2] Aires Renan Felinto de Farias, 2018, Pesqui. Oper., V38, P331
  • [3] Almeida-Dias J, 2011, THESIS
  • [4] An application of the SMAA-Choquet method to evaluate the performance of sailboats in offshore regattas
    Angilella, Silvia
    Arcidiacono, Sally Giuseppe
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Matarazzo, Benedetto
    [J]. OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (02) : 771 - 793
  • [5] Robust sustainable development assessment with composite indices aggregating interacting dimensions: The hierarchical-SMAA-Choquet integral approach
    Angilella, Silvia
    Catalfo, Pierluigi
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Giarlotta, Alfio
    Greco, Salvatore
    Rizzo, Marcella
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 158 : 136 - 153
  • [6] Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis for the Choquet integral preference model and the scale construction problem
    Angilella, Silvia
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 240 (01) : 172 - 182
  • [7] MUSA-INT: Multicriteria customer satisfaction analysis with interacting criteria
    Angilella, Silvia
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Slowinski, Roman
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 42 (01): : 189 - 200
  • [8] Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral
    Angilella, Silvia
    Greco, Salvatore
    Matarazzo, Benedetto
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 201 (01) : 277 - 288
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2002, Aiding decisions with multiple criteria: Essays in honour of Bernard Roy
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2002, AIDING DECISIONS MUL