Evaluating professional development for blended learning in higher education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence

被引:12
作者
Garone, Anja [1 ]
Bruggeman, Bram [1 ]
Philipsen, Brent [1 ]
Pynoo, Bram [2 ]
Tondeur, Jo [1 ]
Struyven, Katrien [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Educ Sci, Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] VIVES Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Expertise Social Innovat, Doorniksesteenweg 145, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[3] Univ Hasselt, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Blended learning; evaluative framework; Higher education; Professional development; Qualitative synthesis; TEACH ONLINE; FACULTY; TECHNOLOGY; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-022-10928-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Successful implementation of blended learning initiatives requires careful planning and consideration of multidimensional factors. Focusing on evaluation and accountability for the design of professional development initiatives (PDIs) is the next step towards creating efficient and effective PDIs. This is especially needed since the Covid-19 pandemic has seen a dramatic shift towards using, and training for integration of digital teaching tools in higher education. The purpose of this qualitative research is to synthesize how professional development initiatives for blended learning in higher education institutions can be evaluated. Following a systematic review of the literature, fourteen empirical research articles were withheld and analyzed qualitatively using an inductive coding framework inspired by the 5 levels of evaluation by ( Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.). The results show that evaluation can be organized into five categories which correspond to the five evaluative levels for professional development by Guskey. The study concludes with recommendations and approaches for each evaluation category with a particular focus on higher education contextual challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:7599 / 7628
页数:30
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adekola J, 2017, RES LEARN TECHNOL, V25, DOI 10.25304/rlt.v25.1973
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   Beliefs and engagement in an institution-wide pedagogic shift [J].
Antunes, Virginia Teixeira ;
Armellini, Alejandro ;
Howe, Robert .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 28 (06) :1328-1348
[4]   Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment [J].
Biggs, J .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 32 (03) :347-364
[5]   Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens [J].
Brinkley-Etzkorn, Karen E. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 38 :28-35
[6]   Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning [J].
Carbonell, Katerina Bohle ;
Dailey-Hebert, Amber ;
Gijselaers, Wim .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 18 :29-37
[7]   Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: an exploration of teachers' experiences in a blended learning course [J].
Comas-Quinn, Anna .
RECALL, 2011, 23 :218-232
[8]  
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2018, CASP QUAL CHECKL
[9]   Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning [J].
Donnelly, Roisin .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 54 (02) :350-359
[10]   Online teacher development: collaborating in a virtual learning environment [J].
Ernest, Pauline ;
Guitert Catasus, Montse ;
Hampel, Regine ;
Heiser, Sarah ;
Hopkins, Joseph ;
Murphy, Linda ;
Stickler, Ursula .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2013, 26 (04) :311-333