How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers

被引:21
作者
Newton, Danielle [1 ]
Bayly, Chris [2 ]
McNamee, Kathleen [3 ,4 ]
Hardiman, Annarella [5 ]
Bismark, Marie [6 ]
Webster, Amy [7 ]
Keogh, Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Hlth Equ, Gender & Womens Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Royal Womens Hosp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Family Planning Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Royal Womens Hosp, Pregnancy Advisory Serv, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Hlth Policy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Womens Hlth Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
abortion; Australia; health professionals; medical abortion; patient choice; MIFEPRISTONE; TRIAL; ACCEPTABILITY; EXPERIENCES; MISOPROSTOL;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.12506
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundDepending on availability, many Australian women seeking an abortion will be faced with the choice between surgical or medical abortion. Little is known about the factors that influence Australian women's choice of method. AimThrough the perspectives of abortion service providers, this study aimed to explore the factors that contribute to Australian women's decision to have a surgical or medical abortion. Materials and MethodsIn 2015, in-depth interviews were conducted with fifteen Victorian-based key informants (KIs) directly providing or working within a service offering medical abortion. Ten KIs were working at a service that also provided surgical abortion. Interviews were semi-structured, conducted face-to-face or over the telephone, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. ResultsKIs described varying levels of awareness of medical abortion, with poorer awareness in regional areas. When it comes to accessing information, women were informed by: their own research (often online); their own experiences and the experiences of others; and advice from health professionals. Women's reasons for choosing surgical or medical abortion range from the pragmatic (timing and location of the method, support at home) to the subjective (perceived risk, emotional impact, privacy, control, and physical ability). ConclusionsWomen benefit from an alternative to surgical abortion and are well-placed to choose between the two methods, however, challenges remain to ensure that all women are enabled to make an informed choice. KIs identify the need to: promote the availability of medical abortion; address misconceptions about this method; and increase general practitioner involvement in the provision of medical abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 529
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical or medical abortion of pregnancies between 13+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation? A systematic review and new NICE national guidelines
    Schmidt-Hansen, Mia
    Lohr, Patricia A.
    Cameron, Sharon
    Hasler, Elise
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2021, 47 (03) : E10
  • [42] Characteristics and contraceptive practices among Chinese women seeking abortion: a multicentre, descriptive study from 2019 to 2021
    Tu, Pengcheng
    Hu, Denghui
    Wu, Shangchun
    Li, Jianan
    Jiang, Xiaomei
    Pei, Kaiyan
    Zhang, Wei-Hong
    BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 50 (04) : 252 - 261
  • [43] Knowledge and attitudes about the differences between emergency contraception and medical abortion among middle-class women and men of reproductive age in Mexico City
    Gould, H
    Ellertson, C
    Corona, G
    CONTRACEPTION, 2002, 66 (06) : 417 - 426
  • [44] Sources, Providers and Self-Reported Complications among Indian Women Seeking Induced Abortion: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2015-16)
    Shekhar, Chander
    Alagarajan, Manoj
    Pradhan, Manas Ranjan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEXUAL HEALTH, 2018, 30 (04) : 366 - 379
  • [45] Estimating abortion prevalence and understanding perspectives of community leaders and providers: Results from a mixed-method study in Istanbul, Turkey
    Huber-Krum, Sarah
    Karadon, Duygu
    Kurutas, Sebahat
    Rohr, Julia
    Baykal, Simay Sevval
    Okcuoglu, Bahar Ayca
    Esmer, Yilmaz
    Canning, David
    Shah, Iqbal
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 16
  • [46] Comparative satisfaction of receiving medical abortion service from nurses and auxiliary nurse-midwives or doctors in Nepal: results of a randomized trial
    Tamang, Anand
    Shah, Iqbal H.
    Shrestha, Pragya
    Warriner, I. K.
    Wang, Duolao
    Thapa, Kusum
    Huong, N. T. My
    Meirik, Olav
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2017, 14
  • [47] Women's desires for mental health support following a pregnancy loss, termination of pregnancy for medical reasons, or abortion: A report from the STRONG Women Study
    Doyle, Colleen
    Che, Mambo
    Lu, Zhanni
    Roesler, Michelle
    Larsen, Karin
    Williams, Lindsay A.
    GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 84 : 149 - 157
  • [48] From women's "irresponsibility' to foetal "patienthood': Obstetricians-gynaecologists' perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluna
    De Zordo, Silvia
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 13 (06) : 711 - 723
  • [49] Fear of childbirth after medical versus surgical abortion. Population-based register study from Finland
    Kemppainen, Venla
    Niinimaki, Maarit
    Bloigu, Aini
    Saisto, Terhi
    Rouhe, Hanna
    Gissler, Mika
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    Mentula, Maarit
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (04) : 743 - 750
  • [50] Travel distances from institutions designated to detain women and girls to procedural (surgical) abortion facilities in Australia: A geospatial analysis
    Heggie, Clare
    Noonan, Anna
    Paynter, Martha
    WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2024, 107