High-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions in different international electronic health record systems: A comparative study

被引:10
作者
Cornu, Pieter [1 ]
Phansalkar, Shobha [2 ,3 ]
Seger, Diane L. [2 ,4 ]
Cho, Insook [5 ]
Pontefract, Sarah [6 ]
Robertson, Alexandra [7 ]
Bates, David W. [2 ,3 ,8 ]
Slight, Sarah P. [2 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Fac Med & Pharm, Clin Pharmacol & Clin Pharm KFAR, Res Grp, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Partners Healthcare, Ctr Patient Safety Res & Practice, Div Gen Internal Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, 250 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA USA
[4] Partners Healthcare, Wellesley, MA USA
[5] Inha Univ, Dept Nursing, Incheon, South Korea
[6] Univ Birmingham, Inst Clin Sci, Sch Pharm, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[7] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, 145 Harrison Ave, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[8] Harvard Sch Publ Hlth, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA USA
[9] Newcastle Univ, Sch Pharm, King George VI Bldg,Queen Victoria Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[10] Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Queen Victoria Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Clinical decision support systems; Drug interactions; Hospital; Electronic health records; High-risk medicines; CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; INTERACTION ALERTS; SAFETY ALERTS; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.027
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate whether alert warnings for high-priority and low-priority drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were present in five international electronic health record (EHR) systems, to compare and contrast the severity level assigned to them, and to establish the proportion of alerts that were overridden. Methods: We conducted a comparative, retrospective, multinational study using a convenience sample of 5 EHRs from the U.S., U.K., Republic of Korea and Belgium. Results: Of the 15 previously defined, high-priority, class-based DDIs, alert warnings were found to exist for 11 in both the Korean and UK systems, 9 in the Belgian system, and all 15 in the two US systems. The specific combinations that were included in these class-based DDIs varied considerably in number, type and level of severity amongst systems. Alerts were only active for 8.4% (52/619) and 52.4% (111/212) of the specific drug-drug combinations contained in the Belgian and UK systems, respectively. Hard stops (not possible to override) existed in the US and UK systems only. The override rates for high-priority alerts requiring provider action ranged from 56.7% to 83.3%. Of the 33 previously defined low-priority DDIs, active alerts existed only in the US systems, for three class-based DDIs. The majority were non-interruptive. Conclusions: Alert warnings existed for most of the high-priority DDIs in the different EHRs but overriding them was easy in most of the systems. In addition to validating the high-and low-priority DDIs, this study reported a lack of standardization in DDI levels across different international knowledge bases.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Drug interaction alert override rates in the Meaningful Use era No evidence of progress [J].
Bryant, A. D. ;
Fletcher, G. S. ;
Payne, T. H. .
APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 5 (03) :802-813
[2]   Critical Drug-Drug Interactions for Use in Electronic Health Records Systems With Computerized Physician Order Entry: Review of Leading Approaches [J].
Classen, David C. ;
Phansalkar, Shobha ;
Bates, David W. .
JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2011, 7 (02) :61-65
[3]   Physician's expectations regarding prescribing clinical decision support systems in a Belgian hospital [J].
Cornu, P. ;
Steurbaut, S. ;
De Beukeleer, M. ;
Putman, K. ;
van de Velde, R. ;
Dupont, A. G. .
ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2014, 69 (03) :157-164
[4]   Pilot evaluation of an optimized context-specific drug-drug interaction alerting system: A controlled pre-post study [J].
Cornu, Pieter ;
Steurbaut, Stephane ;
Gentens, Kristof ;
Van de Velde, Rudi ;
Dupont, Alain G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (09) :617-629
[5]   Performance of a clinical decision support system and of clinical pharmacists in preventing drug-drug interactions on a geriatric ward [J].
Cornu, Pieter ;
Steurbaut, Stephane ;
Sostaric, Sabina ;
Mrhar, Ales ;
Dupont, Alain G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2014, 36 (03) :519-525
[6]   Adherence to drug-drug interaction alerts in high-risk patients: a trial of context-enhanced alerting [J].
Duke, Jon D. ;
Li, Xiaochun ;
Dexter, Paul .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2013, 20 (03) :494-498
[7]  
Duke Jon D, 2011, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2011, P339
[8]   Clinical decision support for drug-drug interactions: Improvement needed [J].
Horn, John R. ;
Gumpper, Karl F. ;
Hardy, J. Chad ;
McDonnell, Patrick J. ;
Phansalkar, Shobha ;
Reilly, Cynthia .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2013, 70 (10) :905-909
[9]   Medication-related clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry systems: A review [J].
Kuperman, Gilad J. ;
Bobb, Anne ;
Payne, Thomas H. ;
Avery, Anthony J. ;
Gandhi, Tejal K. ;
Burns, Gerard ;
Classen, David C. ;
Bates, David W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2007, 14 (01) :29-40
[10]  
Lanssiers R, 2002, Stud Health Technol Inform, V93, P69