Diversity in IR Theory: Pluralism as an Opportunity for Understanding Global Politics

被引:13
作者
Ferguson, Yale H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Univ Newark, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
关键词
IR theory; pluralism; global politics; INTERNATIONAL-RELATIONS; RISE; END;
D O I
10.1111/insp.12092
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Rather than dead or even moribund, International Relations (IR) theory is most certainly "alive," although of course exactly how "well" remains a matter for debate. This article explains that each of the traditional and more recent "schools" of theory has its important strengths and serious weaknesses. Some theories are more appropriately applied to particular problems than to others. Analysts need to be conversant with a wide range of theories so they can recognize them when they are being employed (even only implicitly) and also use them as a toolkit when developing a research subject or explanations for patterns observed. Viewing some subjects simultaneously from more than one theoretical perspective often enhances understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Ackerly BA, 2006, FEMINIST METHODOLOGIES FOR INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511617690.001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INT ORGAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], S HAWKING UNFETTERED
[4]  
[Anonymous], END IR THEORY WE KNO
[5]  
BARBER BENJAMIN, 1996, JIHDA
[6]  
Bronner S.E., 2011, CRITICAL THEORY VERY
[7]  
Bull Hedley., 1977, ANARCHICAL SOC STUDY
[8]  
Cerny PhilipG., 2010, RETHINKING WORLD POL
[9]  
Cochran Molly., 1999, NORMATIVE THEORY INT
[10]  
Der Derian J., 2009, Critical practices in international theory