Quantitative testing of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine to identify urine sample spiking during office-based opioid treatment

被引:16
作者
Suzuki, Joji [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zinser, Jennifer [1 ]
Issa, Mohammed [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rodriguez, Claudia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Psychiat, 75 Francis St PB1, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Faulkner Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Faulkner Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Buprenorphine; diversion; urine adulteration; urine testing; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; MASS-SPECTROMETRY; DIVERSION; INJECTION; METHADONE; SUBOXONE(R); AUSTRALIA; NALOXONE; CLIENTS;
D O I
10.1080/08897077.2017.1356796
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients may spike urine samples with buprenorphine during office-based opioid treatment to simulate adherence to prescribed buprenorphine, potentially to conceal diversion of medications. However, routine immunoassay screens do not detect instances of spiking, as these would simply result in a positive result. The aim of this study was to report on the experience of using quantitative urine testing for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine to facilitate the identification of urine spiking. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 168 consecutive patients enrolled in outpatient buprenorphine treatment at an urban academic medical setting between May 2013 and August 2014. All urine samples submitted were subjected to quantitative urine toxicology testing for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine. Norbuprenorphine-to-buprenorphine ratio of less than 0.02 were further examined for possible spiking. Demographic and clinical variables were also extracted from medical records. Clinical and demographic variables of those who did and did not spike their urines were compared. Statistically significant variables from the univariate testing were entered as predictors of spiking in a regression analysis. Results: A total of 168 patients were included, submitting a total of 2275 urine samples. Patients provided on average 13.6 (SD = 9.9) samples, and were in treatment for an average 153.1days (SD = 142.2). In total, 8 samples (0.35%) from 8 patients (4.8%) were deemed to be spiked. All of the samples suspected of spiking contained buprenorphine levels greater than 2000ng/mL, with a mean norbuprenorphine level of 11.9ng/mL. Spiked samples were submitted by 6 patients (75.0%) during the intensive outpatient (IOP) phase of treatment, 2 patients (25.0%) during the weekly phase, and none from the monthly phase. Regression analysis indicated that history of intravenous drug use and submission of cocaine-positive urine samples at baseline were significant predictors of urine spiking. Conclusions: Even though only a small number of patients were identified to have spiked their urine samples, quantitative testing may help identify urine spiking during office-based opioid treatment with buprenorphine.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 507
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, CLIN GUID US BUPR TR
[2]   Buprenorphine and nor-buprenorphine levels in head hair samples from former heroin users under Suboxone® treatment [J].
Belivanis, Stamatis ;
Tzatzarakis, Manolis N. ;
Vakonaki, Elena ;
Kovatsi, Leda ;
Mantsi, Mary ;
Alegakis, Athanasios ;
Kavvalakis, Matthaios P. ;
Vynias, Dionisios ;
Tsatsakis, Aristidis M. .
DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS, 2014, 6 :93-100
[3]   'Diversion' of methadone or buprenorphine: 'harm' versus 'helping' [J].
Havnes, Ingrid Amalia ;
Clausen, Thomas ;
Middelthon, Anne-Lise .
HARM REDUCTION JOURNAL, 2013, 10
[4]   Urinary buprenorphine concentrations in patients treated with Suboxone® as determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and CEDIA immunoassay [J].
Hull, Mindy J. ;
Bierer, Michael F. ;
Griggs, David A. ;
Long, William H. ;
Nixon, Andrea L. ;
Flood, James G. .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 32 (07) :516-521
[5]   Is this urine really negative? A systematic review of tampering methods in urine drug screening and testing [J].
Jaffee, William B. ;
Trucco, Elisa ;
Levy, Sharon ;
Weiss, Roger D. .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2007, 33 (01) :33-42
[6]   Diversion of Methadone and Buprenorphine from Opioid Substitution Treatment: Patients who Regularly Sell or Share Their Medication [J].
Johnson, Bjorn ;
Richert, Torkel .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2015, 34 (01) :1-17
[7]   The diversion and injection of a buprenorphine-naloxone soluble film formulation [J].
Larance, Briony ;
Lintzeris, Nicholas ;
Ali, Robert ;
Dietze, Paul ;
Mattick, Richard ;
Jenkinson, Rebecca ;
White, Nancy ;
Degenhardt, Louisa .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2014, 136 :21-27
[8]   Urine Spiking in a Pain Medicine Clinic: An Attempt to Simulate Adherence [J].
Lee, Dayong ;
Bazydlo, Lindsay A. L. ;
Reisfield, Gary M. ;
Goldberger, Bruce A. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (07) :1449-1451
[9]   Efficacy of continuing medical education to reduce the risk of buprenorphine diversion [J].
Lofwall, Michelle R. ;
Wunsch, Martha J. ;
Nuzzo, Paul A. ;
Walsh, Sharon L. .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2011, 41 (03) :321-329
[10]   FAKE URINE SAMPLES FOR DRUG ANALYSIS - HOT, BUT NOT HOT ENOUGH [J].
PERSON, NB ;
EHRENKRANZ, JRL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (06) :841-841