Forecasting risk measures using intraday data in a generalized autoregressive score framework

被引:32
作者
Lazar, Emese [1 ]
Xue, Xiaohan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Henley Business Sch, ICMA Ctr, Reading RG6 6BA, Berks, England
关键词
Value at risk; Expected shortfall; Generalized autoregressive score dynamics; Realized measures; Intraday data; Risk forecasting; EXPECTED SHORTFALL; VOLATILITY MODELS; INFORMATION; RETURNS; GARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.10.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A new framework for the joint estimation and forecasting of dynamic value at risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) is proposed by our incorporating intraday information into a generalized autoregressive score (GAS) model introduced by Patton et al., 2019 to estimate risk measures in a quantile regression set-up. We consider four intraday measures: the realized volatility at 5-min and 10-min sampling frequencies, and the overnight return incorporated into these two realized volatilities. In a forecasting study, the set of newly proposed semiparametric models are applied to four international stock market indices (S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nikkei 225 and FTSE 100) and are compared with a range of parametric, nonparametric and semiparametric models, including historical simulations, generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models and the original GAS models. VaR and ES forecasts are backtested individually, and the joint loss function is used for comparisons. Our results show that GAS models, enhanced with the realized volatility measures, outperform the benchmark models consistently across all indices and various probability levels. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Institute of Forecasters.
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1072
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Acerbi C., 2014, Risk, V27, P76
[2]   Range-based estimation of stochastic volatility models [J].
Alizadeh, S ;
Brandt, MW ;
Diebold, FX .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03) :1047-1091
[3]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Fundamental review of the trading book: A revised market risk framework, consultative document
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Journal of Derivatives, DOI DOI 10.3905/JOD.1995.407942
[6]   Coherent measures of risk [J].
Artzner, P ;
Delbaen, F ;
Eber, JM ;
Heath, D .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) :203-228
[7]   Combining Value-at-Risk forecasts using penalized quantile regressions [J].
Bayer, Sebastian .
ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS, 2018, 8 :56-77
[8]   Switching generalized autoregressive score copula models with application to systemic risk [J].
Bernardi, Mauro ;
Catania, Leopoldo .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2019, 34 (01) :43-65
[9]   Forecasting S&P 100 volatility: the incremental information content of implied volatilities and high-frequency index returns [J].
Blair, BJ ;
Poon, SH ;
Taylor, SJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2001, 105 (01) :5-26
[10]   The joint credit risk of UK global-systemically important banks [J].
Cerrato, Mario ;
Crosby, John ;
Kim, Minjoo ;
Zhao, Yang .
JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2017, 37 (10) :964-988