Nonlinear 3D numerical computations for the square membrane versus experimental data

被引:9
作者
Wang, S. [1 ]
Liu, G. R. [2 ]
Zhang, Z. Q. [3 ]
Chen, L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn, Ctr Adv Computat Engn Sci, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[3] Singapore MIT Alliance, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Membrane ballooning; Membrane deformation; Edge-based Smoothed Finite Element Method; Finite Element Method; Model validation; LARGE DEFLECTION ANALYSIS; ELEMENT; MECHANICS; DEFORMATIONS; FORM; FEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.023
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents a discussion on the three-dimensional (3D) mechanical model proposed by Shi et al. for the membrane deformation by comparing the experimental results, and the limitation of this model to predict the behaviors of the membrane structure with large deformations (i.e. geometric nonlinearity). Three nonlinear numerical models, all of which can avoid the limitation, are then established to simulate the membrane's large deformations, including the membrane model with zero bending stiffness and the shell model with small but nonzero bending stiffness based on the latest Edge-based Smoothed Finite Element Method (ES-FEM) as well as the standard Finite Element Method (FEM). The effects of geometric nonlinearity on the numerical results are carefully checked by comparing the benchmark experimental results, and the effects of different models/methods on the numerical results are also quantitatively examined. Factors, e.g. pressure fluctuations in the experiment and boundary conditions in the numerical models, are discussed to illustrate the differences between the numerical and experimental results, so as to provide some further suggestions on the improvements of the corresponding numerical models. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1828 / 1837
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Numerical methods for constrained optimization in 2D and 3D biomechanics
    Nedoma, J
    Bartos, M
    Kestránek, Z
    Kestranek, Z
    Stehlík, J
    NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS, 1999, 6 (07) : 557 - 586
  • [42] On 3D and 1D mathematical modeling of physically nonlinear beams
    Krysko, A., V
    Awrejcewicz, J.
    Zhigalov, M., V
    Bodyagina, K. S.
    Krysko, V. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2021, 134
  • [43] Numerical modelling of 3D sloshing experiments in rectangular tanks
    Battaglia, Laura
    Cruchaga, Marcela
    Storti, Mario
    D'Elia, Jorge
    Nunez Aedo, Jonathan
    Reinoso, Ricardo
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 59 : 357 - 378
  • [44] 3D numerical simulations of vesicle and inextensible capsule dynamics
    Farutin, Alexander
    Biben, Thierry
    Misbah, Chaouqi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2014, 275 : 539 - 568
  • [45] 3D numerical modeling of vertical geothermal heat exchangers
    Ozudogru, T. Y.
    Olgun, C. G.
    Senol, A.
    GEOTHERMICS, 2014, 51 : 312 - 324
  • [46] Numerical Evaluation of Efforts on the Femoral Head in a 3D Model
    Souza, Rhaira H. C.
    Naves, Eduardo L. M.
    XXVI BRAZILIAN CONGRESS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, CBEB 2018, VOL 1, 2019, 70 (01): : 323 - 326
  • [47] Nonlinear compressive deformations of buckled 3D ribbon mesostructures
    Cheng, Xu
    Zhang, Yihui
    EXTREME MECHANICS LETTERS, 2021, 42
  • [48] VALIDATION NUMERICAL MODELLING WITH 3D OPTICAL MEASUREMENT DEFORMATIONS
    Nestorovic, Biserka
    Grbac, Ivica
    WOOD IS GOOD - EU PREACCESSION CHALLENGES OF THE SECTOR, 2011, : 139 - 146
  • [49] Efficient 3D nonlinear Winkler model for shallow foundations
    El Ganainy, H.
    El Naggar, M. H.
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (08) : 1236 - 1248
  • [50] 3D numerical analyses of geosynthetic encased stone columns
    Keykhosropur, L.
    Soroush, A.
    Imam, R.
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2012, 35 : 61 - 68