Effects of Craniofacial Morphology on Nasal Respiratory Function and Upper Airway Morphology

被引:10
作者
Gong, Xu [1 ]
Li, Weiran [1 ]
Gao, Xuemei [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Orthodont, 22 South Zhongguancun Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Craniofacial morphology; nasal resistance; nasal respiration; upper airway; PATTERNS; SURGERY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000004638
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Craniofacial skeletal patterns change after orthognathic surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of different craniofacial patterns on nasal respiratory function and the upper airway. Methods: Forty-seven healthy subjects were selected and divided into 3 groups according to their mandibular position. Sixteen were in the skeletal Class I group, 15 were in the skeletal Class II group, and 16 were in the skeletal Class III group. Cone beam computed tomography was performed, and nasal airflow and nasal resistance were measured. Differences in nasal respiratory functions and upper airway were compared among the groups. A correlation analysis was conducted for nasal respiratory function, upper airway, and skeletal patterns. Results: There were significant differences among the 3 groups regarding dominant-side nasal inspiratory capacity (P = 0.001), bilateral nasal inspiratory capacity (P = 0.005), nasal partitioning ratio-inspiration (P = 0.007), and velopharyngeal minimum crosssectional area (P = 0.029). The values were significantly higher for the skeletal Class III group than the skeletal Class I and II groups. A correlation analysis showed that the nasal partitioning ratio and nasal airway resistance were mostly negatively correlated with SNA, but the upper airway volume and cross-sectional area were positively correlated with SNB and negatively correlated with ANB. The dominant-side nasal expiratory capacity was mainly negatively correlated with the mean velopharyngeal cross-sectional area (r = -0.324, P = 0.026), mean glossopharyngeal crosssectional area (Glosso-A mean) (r = -0.293, P = 0.046), and mean total airway cross-sectional area (Total-A mean) (r = -0.307, P = 0.036). Conclusion: Craniofacial skeletal morphology may affect nasal respiratory function and the upper airway.
引用
收藏
页码:1717 / 1722
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Evaluation of pharyngeal airway space amongst different skeletal patterns
    Alves, M., Jr.
    Franzotti, E. S.
    Baratieri, C.
    Nunes, L. K. F.
    Nojima, L. I.
    Ruellas, A. C. O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (07) : 814 - 819
  • [2] Effects on nasal airflow and resistance using two different RME appliances: a randomized controlled trial
    Bazargani, Farhan
    Magnuson, Anders
    Ludwig, Bjoern
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 40 (03) : 281 - 284
  • [3] Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
    Celikoglu, Mevlut
    Bayram, Mehmet
    Sekerci, Ahmet E.
    Buyuk, Suleyman K.
    Toy, Ebubekir
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (05) : 782 - 787
  • [4] The use of nasal spirometry as an objective measure of nasal septal deviation and the effectiveness of septal surgery
    Cuddihy, PJ
    Eccles, R
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 28 (04) : 325 - 330
  • [5] Upper and lower pharyngeal airways in subjects with Class I and Class II malocclusions and different growth patterns
    de Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    Penteado Virmond Alcazar, Nadyr Maria
    Janson, Guilherme
    Salvatore de Freitas, Karina Maria
    Castanha Henriques, Jose Fernando
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 130 (06) : 742 - 745
  • [6] El H, 2013, EUR J ORTHODONT, V35, P262, DOI 10.1093/ejo/cjr114
  • [7] Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns
    El, Hakan
    Palomo, Juan Martin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (06) : E511 - E521
  • [8] Hanif J, 2003, RHINOLOGY, V41, P11
  • [9] Haraguchi S, 2002, ANGLE ORTHOD, V72, P28
  • [10] Iwasaki T., 2009, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V136, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AJODO.2009.04.010