Exploratory Graph Analysis for Factor Retention: Simulation Results for Continuous and Binary Data

被引:28
作者
Cosemans, Tim [1 ]
Rosseel, Yves [2 ]
Gelper, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
exploratory factor analysis; factor retention; simulation; binary data; exploratory graph analysis; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; PARALLEL ANALYSIS; CORRELATION-MATRICES; SAMPLE-SIZE; NUMBER; DIMENSIONALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; COMPONENTS; ACCURACY; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1177/00131644211059089
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Exploratory graph analysis (EGA) is a commonly applied technique intended to help social scientists discover latent variables. Yet, the results can be influenced by the methodological decisions the researcher makes along the way. In this article, we focus on the choice regarding the number of factors to retain: We compare the performance of the recently developed EGA with various traditional factor retention criteria. We use both continuous and binary data, as evidence regarding the accuracy of such criteria in the latter case is scarce. Simulation results, based on scenarios resulting from varying sample size, communalities from major factors, interfactor correlations, skewness, and correlation measure, show that EGA outperforms the traditional factor retention criteria considered in most cases in terms of bias and accuracy. In addition, we show that factor retention decisions for binary data are preferably made using Pearson, instead of tetrachoric, correlations, which is contradictory to popular belief.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 910
页数:31
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   How to Determine the Number of Factors to Retain in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Comparison of Extraction Methods Under Realistic Conditions [J].
Auerswald, Max ;
Moshagen, Morten .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2019, 24 (04) :468-491
[2]   Using Exploratory Factor Analysis to Determine the Dimensionality of Discrete Responses [J].
Barendse, M. T. ;
Oort, F. J. ;
Timmerman, M. E. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2015, 22 (01) :87-101
[3]  
Bartholomew D., 2008, Analysis of multivariate social science data, VSecond
[4]   Recovery of weak common factors by maximum likelihood and ordinary least squares estimation [J].
Briggs, NE ;
MacCallum, RC .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2003, 38 (01) :25-56
[5]   SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276
[6]   Accuracy of the Parallel Analysis Procedure With Polychoric Correlations [J].
Cho, Sun-Joo ;
Li, Feiming ;
Bandalos, Deborah .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2009, 69 (05) :748-759
[7]   A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research [J].
Conway, JM ;
Huffcutt, AI .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2003, 6 (02) :147-168
[8]   Evaluation of Parallel Analysis Methods for Determining the Number of Factors [J].
Crawford, Aaron V. ;
Green, Samuel B. ;
Levy, Roy ;
Lo, Wen-Juo ;
Scott, Lietta ;
Svetina, Dubravka ;
Thompson, Marilyn S. .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 70 (06) :885-901
[9]   Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size [J].
de Winter, J. C. F. ;
Dodou, D. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2012, 39 (04) :695-710
[10]   Common Factor Analysis versus Principal Component Analysis: A Comparison of Loadings by Means of Simulations [J].
De Winter, Joost C. F. ;
Dodou, Dimitra .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2016, 45 (01) :299-321