Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study

被引:17
作者
Nechay, Taras [1 ]
Sazhin, Alexander [1 ]
Titkova, Svetlana [2 ]
Tyagunov, Alexander [1 ]
Anurov, Mikhail [2 ]
Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill [3 ]
Tyagunov, Anton [3 ]
机构
[1] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, State Clin Hosp 1, Moscow, Russia
[2] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Moscow, Russia
[3] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, State Clin Hosp, Moscow, Russia
关键词
ACUTE APPENDICITIS; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; PATHWAY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ERAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve LA outcomes. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LA. Methods A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized nonblinded clinical trial. The mERAS group consisted of 50 patients; the control group, of 54 patients. The mERAS protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). Results Modified protocol reduced median pLOS to 1.25 days vs 2 days in the controls (p<0.0001). Twenty-one (42%) mERAS patients and 4 (7.4%) controls were discharged within 24 h (p<0.001) after surgery; 0 readmissions were reported. Postoperative pain intensity assessed on the visual analogue scale was significantly lower in the mERAS group [mERAS vs control 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery: 2.332.12 vs 4.192.08 (p<0.0001), 2.27 +/- 1.91 vs 4.02 +/- 1.89 (p<0.0001), 2.28 +/- 1.98 vs 3.70 +/- 1.57 (p=0.0001), 1.98 +/- 1.72 vs 3.43 +/- 1.54 (p<0.0001) and 1.80 +/- 1.74 vs 3.00 +/- 1.27 (p=0.032), respectively)]. The severity of shoulder and neck pain was lower but its incidence was similar. Peristalsis recovery was achieved earlier in the study group (median (min-max))-mERAS 7 (2-34) h vs control 11 (3-43) h; p=0.009) but did not affect the time of the first flatus 23 (2-72) h vs 29 (6-70) h, respectively; p=0.499). Conclusions The modified ERAS program for LA has advantages over the traditional approach.Registration This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03754777 (27/11/2018).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical study of electroacupuncture on the recovery of gastrointestinal dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Shuet Ling Chung
    Wen Li
    Qiuyue Wang
    Xiaofeng Qiu
    Yuncheng Tang
    Sheng Hu
    Huangan Wu
    Zhu Jin
    BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 24
  • [42] Randomized clinical trial of enhanced recovery versus standard care after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Lemanu, D. P.
    Singh, P. P.
    Berridge, K.
    Burr, M.
    Birch, C.
    Babor, R.
    MacCormick, A. D.
    Arroll, B.
    Hill, A. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (04) : 482 - 489
  • [43] Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Standard Recovery Pathways in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    S. Prabhakaran
    Shivanshu Misra
    M. Magila
    S. Saravana Kumar
    Sudarsan Kasthuri
    Chinnusamy Palanivelu
    P. Praveen Raj
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 3273 - 3279
  • [44] Energy and Protein Intake After Return Home in Colorectal Surgery Patients With an Enhanced Recovery Program: A Prospective Observational Study
    Hubert, Megane
    Gabriel, Dominique
    El Khouda, Soraya
    Coster, Marine
    Routiaux, Clara
    Hans, Gregory
    Nihant, Nicole
    Joris, Jean
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 36 (03) : 639 - 647
  • [45] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Control Study
    Sharma, Jyoti
    Kumar, Navin
    Huda, Farhanul
    Payal, Yashwant Singh
    SURGERY JOURNAL, 2021, 07 (02) : e92 - e99
  • [46] Clinical study of electroacupuncture on the recovery of gastrointestinal dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Chung, Shuet Ling
    Li, Wen
    Wang, Qiuyue
    Qiu, Xiaofeng
    Tang, Yuncheng
    Hu, Sheng
    Wu, Huangan
    Jin, Zhu
    BMC COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE AND THERAPIES, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in laparoscopic treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis
    Shao-Min Zhang
    Jie Chen
    Hui Li
    Meng-Fu Guo
    Nuan Han
    Jin-Song Sun
    Chong-Fang Zhang
    Lin Su
    Pediatric Surgery International, 39
  • [48] Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in laparoscopic treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis
    Zhang, Shao-Min
    Chen, Jie
    Li, Hui
    Guo, Meng-Fu
    Han, Nuan
    Sun, Jin-Song
    Zhang, Chong-Fang
    Su, Lin
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [49] Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Standard Recovery Pathways in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Prabhakaran, S.
    Misra, Shivanshu
    Magila, M.
    Kumar, S. Saravana
    Kasthuri, Sudarsan
    Palanivelu, Chinnusamy
    Raj, P. Praveen
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2020, 30 (09) : 3273 - 3279
  • [50] Compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery: A prospective cohort study
    Li, Liang
    Jin, Juying
    Min, Su
    Liu, Dan
    Liu, Ling
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (32) : 53531 - 53541