Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study

被引:17
作者
Nechay, Taras [1 ]
Sazhin, Alexander [1 ]
Titkova, Svetlana [2 ]
Tyagunov, Alexander [1 ]
Anurov, Mikhail [2 ]
Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill [3 ]
Tyagunov, Anton [3 ]
机构
[1] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, State Clin Hosp 1, Moscow, Russia
[2] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Moscow, Russia
[3] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, State Clin Hosp, Moscow, Russia
关键词
ACUTE APPENDICITIS; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; PATHWAY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ERAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve LA outcomes. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LA. Methods A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized nonblinded clinical trial. The mERAS group consisted of 50 patients; the control group, of 54 patients. The mERAS protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). Results Modified protocol reduced median pLOS to 1.25 days vs 2 days in the controls (p<0.0001). Twenty-one (42%) mERAS patients and 4 (7.4%) controls were discharged within 24 h (p<0.001) after surgery; 0 readmissions were reported. Postoperative pain intensity assessed on the visual analogue scale was significantly lower in the mERAS group [mERAS vs control 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery: 2.332.12 vs 4.192.08 (p<0.0001), 2.27 +/- 1.91 vs 4.02 +/- 1.89 (p<0.0001), 2.28 +/- 1.98 vs 3.70 +/- 1.57 (p=0.0001), 1.98 +/- 1.72 vs 3.43 +/- 1.54 (p<0.0001) and 1.80 +/- 1.74 vs 3.00 +/- 1.27 (p=0.032), respectively)]. The severity of shoulder and neck pain was lower but its incidence was similar. Peristalsis recovery was achieved earlier in the study group (median (min-max))-mERAS 7 (2-34) h vs control 11 (3-43) h; p=0.009) but did not affect the time of the first flatus 23 (2-72) h vs 29 (6-70) h, respectively; p=0.499). Conclusions The modified ERAS program for LA has advantages over the traditional approach.Registration This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03754777 (27/11/2018).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nair, Abhijit
    Humayid Mohammed Al-Aamri, Hamed
    Azmy Ishaq, Osama
    Haque, Parwez
    JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2022, 11 (05) : 173 - 180
  • [22] Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) With a Program for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
    Hahl, T.
    Peromaa-Haavisto, P.
    Tarkiainen, P.
    Knutar, O.
    Victorzon, M.
    IFSO15: 20TH WORLD CONGRESS, 2016, : 69 - 72
  • [23] Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) with a Program for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
    Hahl, Tilda
    Peromaa-Haavisto, Pipsa
    Tarkiainen, Pekka
    Knutar, Otto
    Victorzon, Mikael
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (03) : 505 - 511
  • [24] Failure of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review
    Sun, Si-Da
    Wu, Ping-Ping
    Zhou, Jun-Feng
    Wang, Jia-Xing
    He, Qing-Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 35 (06) : 1007 - 1014
  • [25] Outcome of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) with a Program for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
    Tilda Hahl
    Pipsa Peromaa-Haavisto
    Pekka Tarkiainen
    Otto Knutar
    Mikael Victorzon
    Obesity Surgery, 2016, 26 : 505 - 511
  • [26] Randomized Prospective Study to Compare Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Umbilical Single-Incision Appendectomy
    Dolores Frutos, Ma
    Abrisqueta, Jesus
    Juan Lujan
    Abellan, Israel
    Parrilla, Pascual
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (03) : 413 - 418
  • [27] Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy in acute appendicitis - a randomized prospective study
    Olmi, S
    Magnone, S
    Bertolini, A
    Croce, E
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (09): : 1193 - 1195
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: A randomized prospective study
    S. Olmi
    S. Magnone
    A. Bertolini
    E. Croce
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 1193 - 1195
  • [29] Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy program in a prospective multicenter study: compliance and key components for success
    C. Llorente
    A. Guijarro
    V. Hernández
    G. Fernández-Conejo
    J. Passas
    L. Aguilar
    A. Tejido
    C. Hernández
    M. Moralejo
    D. Subirá
    C. González-Enguita
    A. Husillos
    F. Ortiz
    M. Sánchez-Chapado
    J. Carballido
    I. Castillón
    E. Mateo
    I. Romero
    J. Fernández del Álamo
    L. Llanes
    C. Blázquez
    M. Sánchez-Encinas
    J. Borrego
    M. Téllez
    L. Díez
    V. M. Carrero
    E. Pérez-Fernández
    L. Fuentes-Ramirez
    S. García Del Valle
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 3121 - 3129
  • [30] Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy program in a prospective multicenter study: compliance and key components for success
    Llorente, C.
    Guijarro, A.
    Hernandez, V
    Fernandez-Conejo, G.
    Passas, J.
    Aguilar, L.
    Tejido, A.
    Hernandez, C.
    Moralejo, M.
    Subira, D.
    Gonzalez-Enguita, C.
    Husillos, A.
    Ortiz, F.
    Sanchez-Chapado, M.
    Carballido, J.
    Castillon, I
    Mateo, E.
    Romero, I
    Fernandez del Alamo, J.
    Llanes, L.
    Blazquez, C.
    Sanchez-Encinas, M.
    Borrego, J.
    Tellez, M.
    Diez, L.
    Carrero, V. M.
    Perez-Fernandez, E.
    Fuentes-Ramirez, L.
    Garcia Del Valle, S.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) : 3121 - 3129