Evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery program components implemented in laparoscopic appendectomy: prospective randomized clinical study

被引:17
作者
Nechay, Taras [1 ]
Sazhin, Alexander [1 ]
Titkova, Svetlana [2 ]
Tyagunov, Alexander [1 ]
Anurov, Mikhail [2 ]
Melnikov-Makarchuk, Kirill [3 ]
Tyagunov, Anton [3 ]
机构
[1] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, State Clin Hosp 1, Moscow, Russia
[2] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, Moscow, Russia
[3] Pirogov Russian Natl Res Med Univ, State Clin Hosp, Moscow, Russia
关键词
ACUTE APPENDICITIS; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; PATHWAY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ERAS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-67591-5
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundLaparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a widely used surgical procedure. Patients often suffer from considerable postoperative pain and indigestion, which prolongs their in-hospital stay. Almost 10% of patients develop postoperative complications. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program has proven its efficacy in elective surgery and could hypothetically improve LA outcomes. Currently, there is no ERAS program for LA. Methods A modified ERAS (mERAS) protocol was studied in a prospective, randomized nonblinded clinical trial. The mERAS group consisted of 50 patients; the control group, of 54 patients. The mERAS protocol included a patient information brochure; minimizing drain use; local anesthesia; low-pressure pneumoperitoneum; early mobilization and oral diet. The primary outcome was postoperative length of stay (pLOS). Results Modified protocol reduced median pLOS to 1.25 days vs 2 days in the controls (p<0.0001). Twenty-one (42%) mERAS patients and 4 (7.4%) controls were discharged within 24 h (p<0.001) after surgery; 0 readmissions were reported. Postoperative pain intensity assessed on the visual analogue scale was significantly lower in the mERAS group [mERAS vs control 0 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery: 2.332.12 vs 4.192.08 (p<0.0001), 2.27 +/- 1.91 vs 4.02 +/- 1.89 (p<0.0001), 2.28 +/- 1.98 vs 3.70 +/- 1.57 (p=0.0001), 1.98 +/- 1.72 vs 3.43 +/- 1.54 (p<0.0001) and 1.80 +/- 1.74 vs 3.00 +/- 1.27 (p=0.032), respectively)]. The severity of shoulder and neck pain was lower but its incidence was similar. Peristalsis recovery was achieved earlier in the study group (median (min-max))-mERAS 7 (2-34) h vs control 11 (3-43) h; p=0.009) but did not affect the time of the first flatus 23 (2-72) h vs 29 (6-70) h, respectively; p=0.499). Conclusions The modified ERAS program for LA has advantages over the traditional approach.Registration This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03754777 (27/11/2018).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prospective, randomized comparative study between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy
    Villalobos Mori, Rafael
    Escoll Rufino, Jordi
    Herrerias Gonzalez, Fernando
    Carmen Mias Carballal, M.
    Escartin Arias, Alfredo
    Olsina Kissler, Jorge Juan
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2014, 92 (07): : 472 - 477
  • [12] Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
    Lee, Won-Suk
    Choi, Sang Tae
    Lee, Jung Nam
    Kim, Keon Kug
    Park, Yeon Ho
    Lee, Woon Kee
    Baek, Jeong-Heum
    Lee, Tae-Hoon
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (02) : 214 - 218
  • [13] Laparoscopic appendectomy - Is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women
    Laine, S
    Rantala, A
    Gullichsen, R
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1997, 11 (02): : 95 - 97
  • [14] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Rationale and Components
    Kleppe, Kyle L.
    Greenberg, Jacob A.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 98 (03) : 499 - +
  • [15] The efficacy of preoperative intravenous acetaminophen for laparoscopic extraperitoneal closure in children with inguinal hernia for The enhanced recovery after surgery: A prospective randomized study
    Takahashi, Toshiaki
    Yamoto, Masaya
    Nomura, Akiyoshi
    Fukumoto, Koji
    Urushihara, Naoto
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY OPEN, 2023, 2
  • [16] Spinal/epidural block as an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized clinical study
    Erdem, Vuslat Muslu
    Donmez, Turgut
    Uzman, Sinan
    Ferahman, Sina
    Hatipoglu, Engin
    Sunamak, Oguzhan
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (02) : 148 - 156
  • [17] Acupoint Stimulation for Enhanced Recovery After Colon Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lu, Zhihong
    Luo, Ailin
    Min, Su
    Dong, Hailong
    Xiong, Qiuju
    Li, Xinhua
    Deng, Qingzhu
    Liu, Tingting
    Yang, Xue
    Li, Chen
    Zhao, Qingchuan
    Xiong, Lize
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2022, 15 : 2871 - 2879
  • [18] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Systematic Review
    Istrate, Antonio Mihai
    Serban, Dragos
    Doran, Horia
    Tudor, Corneliu
    Bobirca, Florin
    Davitoiu, Dragos
    Dumitrescu, Dan
    Popescu, Andrei
    Cherecheanu, Matei Popa
    Tanasescu, Ciprian
    Motofei, Ion
    CHIRURGIA, 2024, 119 (03) : 318 - 329
  • [19] Enhanced recovery after surgery: new perioperative measures should not be implemented at the expense of components of the core programme
    Slim, Karem
    Veziant, Julie
    Joris, Jean
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (06) : 952 - 953
  • [20] Cost-effective appendectomy - Open or laparoscopic? a prospective randomized study
    Heikkinen, TJ
    Haukipuro, K
    Hulkko, A
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1998, 12 (10): : 1204 - 1208