Time-dependent summary receiver operating characteristics for meta-analysis of prognostic studies

被引:3
作者
Hattori, Satoshi [1 ]
Zhou, Xiao-Hua [2 ]
机构
[1] Kurume Univ, Biostat Ctr, Asahi Machi 67, Kurume, Fukuoka 8300011, Japan
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
bivariate normal model; bivariate binomial model; Kaplan-Meier estimator; multiple imputation; summary receiver operating characteristics; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; BREAST-CANCER; ROC CURVES; SURVIVAL; MARKER; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7029
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prognostic studies are widely conducted to examine whether biomarkers are associated with patient's prognoses and play important roles in medical decisions. Because findings from one prognostic study may be very limited, meta-analyses may be useful to obtain sound evidence. However, prognostic studies are often analyzed by relying on a study-specific cut-off value, which can lead to difficulty in applying the standard meta-analysis techniques. In this paper, we propose two methods to estimate a time-dependent version of the summary receiver operating characteristics curve for meta-analyses of prognostic studies with a right-censored time-to-event outcome. We introduce a bivariate normal model for the pair of time-dependent sensitivity and specificity and propose a method to form inferences based on summary statistics reported in published papers. This method provides a valid inference asymptotically. In addition, we consider a bivariate binomial model. To draw inferences from this bivariate binomial model, we introduce a multiple imputation method. The multiple imputation is found to be approximately proper multiple imputation, and thus the standard Rubin's variance formula is justified from a Bayesian view point. Our simulation study and application to a real dataset revealed that both methods work well with a moderate or large number of studies and the bivariate binomial model coupled with the multiple imputation outperforms the bivariate normal model with a small number of studies. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4746 / 4763
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Individual participant data meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies: state of the art?
    Abo-Zaid, Ghada
    Sauerbrei, Willi
    Riley, Richard D.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [2] Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey
    Ahmed, Ikhlaaq
    Sutton, Alexander J.
    Riley, Richard D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [3] Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7306): : 224 - 228
  • [4] Systematic review of multiple studies of prognosis: The feasibility of obtaining individual patient data
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Trivella, Marialena
    Pezzella, Francesco
    Harris, Adrian L.
    Pastorino, Ugo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL METHODS FOR THE HEALTH SCIENCES: APPLICATIONS TO CANCER AND AIDS STUDIES, GENOME SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, AND SURVIVAL ANALYSIS, 2007, : 3 - +
  • [5] Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration
    Altman, Douglas G.
    McShane, Lisa M.
    Sauerbrei, Willi
    Taube, Sheila E.
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (05)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1991, Counting Processes and Survival Analysis
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, STAT METHODS DIAGNOS, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470906514
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2010, BMJ-BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.C1842
  • [9] Meta-analysis confirms BCL2 is an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer
    Callagy, Grace M.
    Webber, Mark J.
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Caldas, Carlos
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [10] Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models
    Chu, Haitao
    Guo, Hongfei
    Zhou, Yijie
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2010, 30 (04) : 499 - 508