Cardiovascular safety of lumiracoxib:: A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials ≥1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

被引:46
作者
Matchaba, P
Gitton, X
Krammer, G
Ehrsam, E
Sloan, VS
Olson, M
Mellein, B
Hoexter, G
Orloff, J
Garaud, JJ
机构
[1] Nova Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
cardiovascular safety; cyclooxygenase-2; inhibitor; NSAID; osteoarthritis; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.019
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The cardiovascular (CV) safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors has been the subject of considerable debate. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of CV events with lumiracoxib by meta-analysis of all completed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of >= 1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: The Novartis Lumiracoxib Clinical Trial Database, which includes all clinical studies conducted to date with lumiracoxib, was reviewed. Data were extracted from RCTs of >= 1 week and up to 1 year in duration, the maximum study duration; 34,668 patients were included in standard and cumulative meta-analyses. Twenty-two RCTs of lumiracoxib 100 to 1200 mg daily were identified; 22,781 patients were included in 1-year trials. Mean age of the patients was 61.5 years and 74% were female. More than 50% of the patients in these studies had hypertension at baseline and 6% had diabetes. Parameters analyzed were the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) composite CV end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke (Ischemic and hemorrhagic), and CV death; MI alone; and stroke alone. Twenty-one of the 22 RCTs have been published. Results: For all 3 parameters, relative risk (RR) was calculated versus non-naproxen NSAIDs, naproxen, and placebo. The results were as follows: for the APTC end point versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.46-1.51; versus naproxen: RR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.94-2.36; versus placebo: RR 1.08,95% CI, 0.41-2.86; for MI alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.28-2.25; versus naproxen: RR 1.69, 95% CI, 0.82-3.48; versus placebo: RR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.25-6.56; and for stroke alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.35-2.35; versus naproxen: RR 1.42, 95% CI, 0.70-2.91; versus placebo: RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.13-2.74. Cumulative meta-analyses of lumiracoxib versus all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen) did not find any significant differences in APTC, MI alone, or stroke alone. Conclusion: This meta-analysis of 34,668 patients receiving >= 1 week and up to 1 year of treatment found no evidence that lumiracoxib was associated with a significant increase in CV risk compared with naproxen, placebo, or all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen).
引用
收藏
页码:1196 / 1214
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The efficacy of probiotic supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Rudbane, Seyed Mohammad Aqaeinezhad
    Rahmdel, Samane
    Abdollahzadeh, Seyedeh Maryam
    Zare, Morteza
    Bazrafshan, Azam
    Mazloomi, Seyed Mohammad
    INFLAMMOPHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 26 (01) : 67 - 76
  • [12] Efficacy and Safety of Celecoxib Therapy in Osteoarthritis A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Xu, Chao
    Gu, Ke
    Yasen, Yalikun
    Hou, Yanjie
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (20)
  • [13] Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab on Osteoarthritis Knee and Hip Pains: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Chen, Junyuan
    Li, Jieruo
    Li, Ruobin
    Wang, Huajun
    Yang, Jie
    Xu, Jichun
    Zha, Zhengang
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (02) : 374 - 385
  • [14] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and filgotinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lee, Y. H.
    Song, G. G.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 79 (06): : 590 - 603
  • [15] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Song, Gwan Gyu
    Choi, Sung Jae
    Lee, Young Ho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (08) : 1563 - 1571
  • [16] Efficacy and safety of dietary polyphenols in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 randomized controlled trials
    Long, Zhiyong
    Xiang, Wang
    He, Qi
    Xiao, Wei
    Wei, Huagen
    Li, Hao
    Guo, Hua
    Chen, Yuling
    Yuan, Mengxia
    Yuan, Xiao
    Zeng, Liuting
    Yang, Kailin
    Deng, Yuxuan
    Huang, Zhen
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [17] The addition of tocilizumab to DMARD therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mao Mao An
    Zui Zou
    Hui Shen
    Jun Dong Zhang
    Yong Bing Cao
    Yuan Ying Jiang
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2010, 66 : 49 - 59
  • [18] The addition of tocilizumab to DMARD therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    An, Mao Mao
    Zou, Zui
    Shen, Hui
    Zhang, Jun Dong
    Cao, Yong Bing
    Jiang, Yuan Ying
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [19] Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine on Osteoarthritis Knee Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Zhao Yu
    Shi, Sheng Ying
    Li, Shu Jie
    Chen, Feng
    Chen, Huang
    Lin, Hai Zhen
    Lin, Jing Ming
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (07) : 1373 - 1385
  • [20] Moxibustion for treating rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sun, Zhi-ling
    Xu, Xiao
    Du, Shi-zheng
    Jiang, Xing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 6 (06) : 621 - 630