Cardiovascular safety of lumiracoxib:: A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials ≥1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

被引:46
作者
Matchaba, P
Gitton, X
Krammer, G
Ehrsam, E
Sloan, VS
Olson, M
Mellein, B
Hoexter, G
Orloff, J
Garaud, JJ
机构
[1] Nova Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[2] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
cardiovascular safety; cyclooxygenase-2; inhibitor; NSAID; osteoarthritis; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.019
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The cardiovascular (CV) safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors has been the subject of considerable debate. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the risk of CV events with lumiracoxib by meta-analysis of all completed, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of >= 1 week and up to 1 year in duration of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: The Novartis Lumiracoxib Clinical Trial Database, which includes all clinical studies conducted to date with lumiracoxib, was reviewed. Data were extracted from RCTs of >= 1 week and up to 1 year in duration, the maximum study duration; 34,668 patients were included in standard and cumulative meta-analyses. Twenty-two RCTs of lumiracoxib 100 to 1200 mg daily were identified; 22,781 patients were included in 1-year trials. Mean age of the patients was 61.5 years and 74% were female. More than 50% of the patients in these studies had hypertension at baseline and 6% had diabetes. Parameters analyzed were the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration (APTC) composite CV end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke (Ischemic and hemorrhagic), and CV death; MI alone; and stroke alone. Twenty-one of the 22 RCTs have been published. Results: For all 3 parameters, relative risk (RR) was calculated versus non-naproxen NSAIDs, naproxen, and placebo. The results were as follows: for the APTC end point versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.46-1.51; versus naproxen: RR 1.49, 95% CI, 0.94-2.36; versus placebo: RR 1.08,95% CI, 0.41-2.86; for MI alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.80, 95% CI, 0.28-2.25; versus naproxen: RR 1.69, 95% CI, 0.82-3.48; versus placebo: RR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.25-6.56; and for stroke alone versus non-naproxen NSAIDs: RR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.35-2.35; versus naproxen: RR 1.42, 95% CI, 0.70-2.91; versus placebo: RR 0.59, 95% CI, 0.13-2.74. Cumulative meta-analyses of lumiracoxib versus all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen) did not find any significant differences in APTC, MI alone, or stroke alone. Conclusion: This meta-analysis of 34,668 patients receiving >= 1 week and up to 1 year of treatment found no evidence that lumiracoxib was associated with a significant increase in CV risk compared with naproxen, placebo, or all comparators (placebo, diclofenac, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, and naproxen).
引用
收藏
页码:1196 / 1214
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cardiovascular safety of lumiracoxib: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in patients with osteoarthritis
    Isla S. Mackenzie
    Li Wei
    Thomas M. MacDonald
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2013, 69 : 133 - 141
  • [2] Cardiovascular safety of lumiracoxib: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in patients with osteoarthritis
    Mackenzie, Isla S.
    Wei, Li
    MacDonald, Thomas M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 69 (02) : 133 - 141
  • [3] Cardiovascular safety of celecoxib in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Bai-Ru
    Chen, Jia-Qi
    Zhang, Xiao-Wen
    Gao, Qin-Yang
    Li, Wei-Hong
    Yan, Li-Jiao
    Zhang, Yu-Qiao
    Wu, Chang-Jiang
    Xing, Jing-Li
    Liu, Jian-Ping
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [4] Efficacy and safety of ginger in osteoarthritis patients: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
    Bartels, E. M.
    Folmer, V. N.
    Bliddal, H.
    Altman, R. D.
    Juhl, C.
    Tarp, S.
    Zhang, W.
    Christensen, R.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2015, 23 (01) : 13 - 21
  • [5] Olokizumab?s Effectiveness and Safety in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mahmoud, Abdelrahman Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2023, 26 (01) : 61 - 82
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of opioids for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Avouac, J.
    Gossec, L.
    Dougados, M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2007, 15 (08) : 957 - 965
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of hydrotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lei, Changjiang
    Chen, Haiting
    Zheng, Su
    Pan, Qingyun
    Xu, Jing
    Li, Yuan
    Liu, Yang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (03) : 1711 - 1722
  • [8] Effectiveness and safety of aerobic exercise for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ye, Hui
    Weng, Heng
    Xu, Yue
    Wang, Lulu
    Wang, Qing
    Xu, Guihua
    BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [9] Effectiveness and safety of aerobic exercise for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hui Ye
    Heng Weng
    Yue Xu
    Lulu Wang
    Qing Wang
    Guihua Xu
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 14
  • [10] The efficacy of probiotic supplementation in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
    Seyed Mohammad Aqaeinezhad Rudbane
    Samane Rahmdel
    Seyedeh Maryam Abdollahzadeh
    Morteza Zare
    Azam Bazrafshan
    Seyed Mohammad Mazloomi
    Inflammopharmacology, 2018, 26 : 67 - 76