Qualitative identification of free-flying bats using the Anabat detector

被引:166
|
作者
O'Farrell, MJ
Miller, BW
Gannon, WL
机构
[1] OFarrell Biol Consulting, Las Vegas, NV 89108 USA
[2] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Museum SW Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Chiroptera; bats; echolocation; vocal signatures; identification; technique; Anabat;
D O I
10.2307/1383203
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
A variety of ultrasonic (bat) detectors have been used over the past 3 decades to identify free-flying bats. Analyses of recorded echolocation calls were slow and typically restricted to few calls and at a resolution obscuring details of call structure. The Anabat II detector and associated zero-crossings analysis system allows an immediate examination, via a laptop computer, of the time-frequency structure of calls as they are detected. These calls can be stored on the hard drive for later examination, editing, and measurement. Many North American bats can be identified to species by qualitatively using certain structural characteristics of calls, primarily approximate maximum and minimum frequencies and morphological aspects of calls (e.g., linearity and changes in slope). To identify calls precisely, it is important to use a continuous sequence of calls from an individual in normal flight rather than from single isolated calls. All calls are not equally useful, and many fragmentary calls must be discarded before making a determination. Each sequence of calls must be examined to ensure that multiple bats have not been simultaneously recorded, which confounds correct identification. We found the percentage of non-usable calls within usable vocal sequences to be highest in vespertilionids (20-40%), whereas for other families this was frequently 10%. Active rather than passive collection of data maximizes quality and quantity of diagnostic calls and provides a contextual base for the investigator.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Kinematics and control in free-flying hoverflies
    Walker, S. M.
    Thomas, A. L. R.
    Taylor, G. K.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 50 : E184 - E184
  • [22] Body temperatures in free-flying pigeons
    N. J. Adams
    B. Pinshow
    L. Z. Gannes
    H. Biebach
    Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 1999, 169 : 195 - 199
  • [23] REDUNDANCY CONTROL OF A FREE-FLYING TELEROBOT
    SPOFFORD, JR
    AKIN, DL
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1990, 13 (03) : 515 - 523
  • [24] Trajectory planning of a free-flying robot by using the optimal control
    Sakawa, Yoshiyuki
    Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 20 (05): : 235 - 248
  • [25] Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds
    Wikelski, M
    Tarlow, EM
    Raim, A
    Diehl, RH
    Larkin, RP
    Visser, GH
    NATURE, 2003, 423 (6941) : 704 - 704
  • [26] HEIGHT CONTROL BY FREE-FLYING DROSOPHILA
    DAVID, CT
    PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1979, 4 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [27] Sideslipping Maneuvers in Free-Flying Hawkmoths
    Greeter, Jeremy S. M.
    Hedrick, Tyson L.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 52 : E254 - E254
  • [28] Body temperatures in free-flying pigeons
    Adams, NJ
    Pinshow, B
    Gannes, LZ
    Biebach, H
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 169 (03) : 195 - 199
  • [29] PARAMETER-IDENTIFICATION OF UNKNOWN OBJECT HANDLED BY FREE-FLYING SPACE ROBOT
    MUROTSU, Y
    SENDA, K
    OZAKI, M
    TSUJIO, S
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 1994, 17 (03) : 488 - 494
  • [30] DYNAMIC CONTROL WITH ADAPTIVE IDENTIFICATION FOR FREE-FLYING SPACE ROBOTS IN JOINT SPACE
    SHIN, JH
    LEE, JJ
    ROBOTICA, 1994, 12 : 541 - 551