Optimal combination forecasts for hierarchical time series

被引:299
作者
Hyndman, Rob J. [1 ]
Ahmed, Roman A. [1 ]
Athanasopoulos, George [1 ]
Shang, Han Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Econometr & Business Stat, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Bottom-up forecasting; Combining forecasts; GLS regression; Hierarchical forecasting; Reconciling forecasts; Top-down forecasting; PREDICTING EARNINGS; NATIONAL ACCOUNTS; LEAST-SQUARES; EURO AREA; BOTTOM-UP; TOP-DOWN; AGGREGATION; INFORMATION; UK; DISAGGREGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2011.03.006
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In many applications, there are multiple time series that are hierarchically organized and can be aggregated at several different levels in groups based on products, geography or some other features. We call these "hierarchical time series". They are commonly forecast using either a "bottom-up" or a "top-down" method. In this paper we propose a new approach to hierarchical forecasting which provides optimal forecasts that are better than forecasts produced by either a top-down or a bottom-up approach. Our method is based on independently forecasting all series at all levels of the hierarchy and then using a regression model to optimally combine and reconcile these forecasts. The resulting revised forecasts add up appropriately across the hierarchy, are unbiased and have minimum variance amongst all combination forecasts under some simple assumptions. We show in a simulation study that our method performs well compared to the top-down approach and the bottom-up method. We demonstrate our proposed method by forecasting Australian tourism demand where the data are disaggregated by purpose of travel and geographical region. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2579 / 2589
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Hierarchical forecasts for Australian domestic tourism [J].
Athanasopoulos, George ;
Ahmed, Roman A. ;
Hyndman, Rob J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2009, 25 (01) :146-166
[2]  
Bernstein D. S., 2005, MATRIX MATH THEORY F
[3]   PREDICTING EARNINGS WITH SUB-ENTITY DATA - SOME FURTHER EVIDENCE [J].
COLLINS, DW .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1976, 14 (01) :163-177
[4]   TOP-DOWN OR BOTTOM-UP - AGGREGATE VERSUS DISAGGREGATE EXTRAPOLATIONS [J].
DANGERFIELD, BJ ;
MORRIS, JS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (02) :233-241
[5]   An overview of the Sparse Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms: The new standard from the BLAS Technical Forum [J].
Duff, IS ;
Heroux, MA ;
Pozo, R .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2002, 28 (02) :239-267
[6]   AGGREGATE VERSUS SUB-AGGREGATE MODELS IN LOCAL AREA FORECASTING [J].
DUNN, DM ;
WILLIAMS, WH ;
DECHAINE, TL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 71 (353) :68-71
[7]   SHOULD AGGREGATION PRIOR TO ESTIMATION BE RULE [J].
EDWARDS, JB ;
ORCUTT, GH .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1969, 51 (04) :409-420
[8]  
Espasa A, 2002, EUROPEAN J FINANCE, V8, P402
[9]  
FAIR RC, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P375
[10]  
Fliedner E. B., 1995, Journal of Operations Management, V12, P119, DOI 10.1016/0272-6963(94)00009-4