Ambidexterity in Agile Distributed Development: An Empirical Investigation

被引:97
作者
Ramesh, Balasubramaniam [1 ]
Mohan, Kannan [2 ]
Cao, Lan [3 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Comp Informat Syst Dept, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
[2] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Zicklin Sch Business, Dept Stat & Comp Informat Syst, New York, NY 10010 USA
[3] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Informat Technol & Decis Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
关键词
agile development; ambidexterity; distributed development; qualitative case study; GLOBAL SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MEDIATING ROLE; EXPLORATION; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS; PERFORMANCE; COMMUNICATION; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1287/isre.1110.0351
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Distributed software development has become a common reality with the advent of off-shore development and the need to be close to markets. Also, the dynamic nature of the environment in which businesses operate suggests the use of agile development methods. Whereas distributed software development requires the use of formal processes advocated by plan-driven approaches, rapidly changing environments are appropriate candidates for the use of agile development methods. This tension in agile distributed development poses conflicting demands between alignment and adaptability in the software development process. We conducted a multisite case study of three projects that use agile distributed development to examine how these organizations developed contextual ambidexterity the ability to pursue conflicting demands simultaneously. Our findings, presented as a conceptual framework, indicate that conflicting demands between alignment and adaptability posed by agile distributed development can be addressed by a set of balanced practices that shape performance management and social context two important antecedents of contextual ambidexterity.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 339
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system [J].
Adler, PS ;
Goldoftas, B ;
Levine, DI .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (01) :43-68
[2]   Flexible and distributed software processes:: Old petunias in new bowls? [J].
Agerfalk, Par J. ;
Fitzgerald, Brian .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2006, 49 (10) :26-34
[3]  
Ambler S. W, 2007, AGILE J
[4]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, DOI DOI 10.1002/NUR.4770140111
[6]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[7]  
Boehm B., 2003, BALANCING AGILITY DI
[8]   INTRAORGANIZATIONAL ECOLOGY OF STRATEGY MAKING AND ORGANIZATIONAL ADAPTATION: THEORY AND FIELD RESEARCH [J].
Burgelman, Robert A. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1991, 2 (03) :239-262
[9]   Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects [J].
Cao, Qing ;
Gedajlovic, Eric ;
Zhang, Hongping .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :781-796
[10]   Agile software development: The people factor [J].
Cockburn, A ;
Highsmith, J .
COMPUTER, 2001, 34 (11) :131-133