An assessment of the effect of printing orientation, density, and filler pattern on the compressive performance of 3D printed ABS structures by fuse deposition

被引:49
作者
Dominguez-Rodriguez, G. [1 ]
Ku-Herrera, J. J. [2 ]
Hernandez-Perez, A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Campeche, Ctr Invest Corros, Ave Heroe Nacozari 480, San Francisco Campeche 24079, Campeche, Mexico
[2] CONACYT, Dept Sintesis Polimeros, Ctr Invest Quim Aplicada, Blvd Enrique Reyna Hermosillo 140, Saltillo 25294, Coahuila, Mexico
[3] Univ Guanajuato, Dept Ingn Mecan, Campus Irapuato Salamanca, Guanajuato 36885, Mexico
关键词
3D printing; Filling patterns; Compression; Ultimate compressive strength; Failure mechanism; Rapid prototyping; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PROCESSED PARTS; STRAIN SENSORS; BEHAVIOR; PROPERTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-017-1314-x
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) specimens manufactured by fused deposition are tested under uniaxial compression in order to judge the effectiveness of printing orientation, density, and filler patterns in terms of stiffness and strength per printing time. The compressive properties of the 3D printed materials along the three orthogonal directions are studied on cylindrical specimens filled with honeycomb and rectangular patterns. In order to achieve different densities, five filler percentages (0, 20, 30, 40, and 100%) are employed for each type of structure. Specimens filled with honeycomb patterns are stiffer and stronger than those with rectangular patterns only when they are oriented along the applied load. However, structures with rectangular patterns only require roughly half of printing time of those filled honeycomb cells, which yields effective rectangular structures with high elastic properties per printing time. Stress-strain curves reveal that compressive strength and stiffness increase with respect to the structure density. Patterns printed along the loading direction present higher strength and stiffness than on the other orthogonal orientations. Local buckling and compressive failure mechanisms are identified for light weight and heavy structures, respectively. A combination of shear and local buckling failure appeared in honeycomb structures printed transversely with relative densities around 20-40%.
引用
收藏
页码:1685 / 1695
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications
    Ambrosi, Adriano
    Pumera, Martin
    [J]. CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2016, 45 (10) : 2740 - 2755
  • [2] [Anonymous], D2344 ASTM
  • [3] Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing
    Bose, Susmita
    Vahabzadeh, Sahar
    Bandyopadhyay, Amit
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2013, 16 (12) : 496 - 504
  • [4] Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory
    Casavola, Caterina
    Cazzato, Alberto
    Moramarco, Vincenzo
    Pappalettere, Carmine
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2016, 90 : 453 - 458
  • [5] Chya-Yan L., 2017, BIOFABRICATION, V9
  • [6] Interfacial mechanical behavior of 3D printed ABS
    Cole, Daniel P.
    Riddick, Jaret C.
    Jaim, H. M. Iftekhar
    Strawhecker, Kenneth E.
    Zander, Nicole E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2016, 133 (30)
  • [7] Conner B. P., 2014, Addit. Manuf, V1-4, P64, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2014.08.005
  • [8] Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30
    Croccolo, Dario
    De Agostinis, Massimiliano
    Olmi, Giorgio
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2013, 79 : 506 - 518
  • [9] Mechanical behaviour of ABS: An experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques
    Dawoud, Michael
    Taha, Iman
    Ebeid, Samy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2016, 21 : 39 - 45
  • [10] Mechanical property characterization and simulation of fused deposition modeling Polycarbonate parts
    Domingo-Espin, Miquel
    Puigoriol-Forcada, Josep M.
    Garcia-Granada, Andres-Amador
    Lluma, Jordi
    Borros, Salvador
    Reyes, Guillermo
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2015, 83 : 670 - 677