Comparison of Embedded and Wrapper Approaches for Feature Selection in Support Vector Machines

被引:3
|
作者
Yamada, Shinichi [1 ]
Neshatian, Kourosh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
Binary Particle Swarm Optimization; Genetic Algorithm; Multiple Kernel Learning; Support Vector Machine; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-29911-8_12
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Feature selection methods are generally divided into three categories: filter, wrapper and embedded approaches. In terms of learning performance, the filter approach is typically inferior compared to the other two because it does not use the target learning algorithm. The embedded and wrapper approaches are both considered high-performing. In this paper we compare the embedded and the wrapper approaches in the context of Support Vector Machines (SVMs). In the wrapper category, we compare well-known algorithms such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Forward and Backward selection, and a new binary Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. For an embedded approach we devise a new heuristic algorithm based on Multiple Kernel Learning.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A wrapper method for feature selection using Support Vector Machines
    Maldonado, Sebastian
    Weber, Richard
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2009, 179 (13) : 2208 - 2217
  • [2] Comparison of Feature Selection Methods in Support Vector Machines
    Kim, Kwangsu
    Park, Changyi
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2013, 26 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [3] Feature selection for support vector machines
    Hermes, L
    Buhmann, JM
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS: PATTERN RECOGNITION AND NEURAL NETWORKS, 2000, : 712 - 715
  • [4] Evolutionary wrapper approaches for training set selection as preprocessing mechanism for support vector machines: Experimental evaluation and support vector analysis
    Verbiest, Nele
    Derrac, Joaquin
    Cornelis, Chris
    Garcia, Salvador
    Herrera, Francisco
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 38 : 10 - 22
  • [5] Feature analysis: Support vector machines approaches
    Shi, Y
    Zhang, TX
    IMAGE EXTRACTION, SEGMENTATION, AND RECOGNITION, 2001, 4550 : 245 - 251
  • [6] Feature selection for bagging of support vector machines
    Li, Guo-Zheng
    Liu, Tian-Yu
    PRICAI 2006: TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4099 : 271 - 277
  • [7] Feature selection for multiclass support vector machines
    Aazi, F. Z.
    Abdesselam, R.
    Achchab, B.
    Elouardighi, A.
    AI COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 29 (05) : 583 - 593
  • [8] Stable Feature Selection with Support Vector Machines
    Kamkar, Iman
    Gupta, Sunil Kumar
    Dinh Phung
    Venkatesh, Svetha
    AI 2015: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 9457 : 298 - 308
  • [9] Optimal feature selection for support vector machines
    Nguyen, Minh Hoai
    de la Torre, Fernando
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2010, 43 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [10] Feature selection for linear support vector machines
    Liang, Zhizheng
    Zhao, Tuo
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 606 - 609