Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its implications for content: climate change and Indigenous populations in WGII

被引:94
作者
Ford, James D. [1 ]
Vanderbilt, Will [1 ]
Berrang-Ford, Lea [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL; CONTROVERSIES; VULNERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE; RELEVANT;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-011-0350-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This essay examines the extent to which we can expect Indigenous Knowledge, understanding, and voices on climate change ('Indigenous content') to be captured in WGII of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), based on an analysis of chapter authorship. Reviewing the publishing history of 309 chapter authors (CAs) to WGII, we document 9 (2.9%) to have published on climate change and Indigenous populations and involved as authors in 6/30 chapters. Drawing upon recent scholarship highlighting how authorship affect structure and content of assessment reports, we argue that, unaddressed, this will affect the extent to which Indigenous content is examined and assessed. While it is too late to alter the structure of AR5, there are opportunities to prioritize the recruitment of contributing authors and reviewers with expertise on Indigenous issues, raise awareness among CAs on the characteristics of impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability faced by Indigenous peoples, and highlight how Indigenous perspectives can help broaden our understanding of climate change and policy interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 213
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ACIA overview report, P1020
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, The earth is faster now: Indigenous observations of Arctic environment change
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE FIX
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Principles governing IPPC work.' Approved at the Fourteenth Session (Vienna, 1-3 October 1998) on 1 October 1998, amended at the Twenty-First Session (Vienna, 3 and 6-7 November 2003), the Twenty-Fifth Session (Mauritius, 26-28 April 2006)
[5]  
[Anonymous], HONEST BROKER MAKING
[6]   Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation [J].
Beck, Silke .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2011, 11 (02) :297-306
[7]   Are we adapting to climate change? [J].
Berrang-Ford, Lea ;
Ford, James D. ;
Paterson, Jaclyn .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (01) :25-33
[8]   Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report [J].
Bjurstrom, Andreas ;
Polk, Merritt .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 87 (03) :525-550
[9]   Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report [J].
Bjurstrom, Andreas ;
Polk, Merritt .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 108 (1-2) :1-22
[10]  
Bolton K, 2011, WHAT WE KNOW DONT KN, P78