Flexible ureterorenoscopy vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stone management: Retrospective study

被引:2
|
作者
Palmero, X. [1 ,2 ]
Balssa, L. [1 ]
Bernardini, S. [1 ]
Chabannes, E. [1 ]
Guichard, G. [1 ]
Bittard, H. [1 ,2 ]
Kleinclauss, F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHRU Jean Minjoz, Serv Urol & Transplantat Renale, 3 Blvd Fleming, F-25030 Besancon, France
[2] Univ Franche Comte, UFR Sci Med & Pharmaceut, F-25030 Besancon, France
[3] INSERM, UMR 1098, Besancon, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2016年 / 26卷 / 09期
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Ureterorenoscopy; Renal stone; Stone free rate; Postoperative Complication; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; KIDNEY-STONES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; URETEROSCOPY; MORBIDITY; CALCULI;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2016.07.299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of renal stone fragmentation by flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS), compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Material and methods. Patients treated between 1998 and 2010 by URS and PCNL for intrarenal stone were reviewed. Patients' and stones' characteristics were analyzed. The preoperative parameters were reported as well as the procedure's efficiency and its complications. Success was defined by the absence of residual lithiasis visualized on renal imaging at 6 months of follow-up. Results. Among 531 patients included, there were 159 PCNL and 372 URS. The mean duration of hospitalization after PCNL was 8 4.6 days and 3 1.7 days after URS. The mean stones' size was higher in the PCNL group (19.9 7.5 mm) than for the URS group (9.7 5.6 mm; P< 0.0001). The stone-free rate was significantly better in the PCNL group for stones measuring between 10 and 20 mm (P < 0.0001) and for stones of more than 20 mm (P= 0.017). Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent (27 %) and more severe (8.8 % vs Clavien III and IV) in the PCNL, than in the URS group, respectively (P=0.0001). Conclusion. PCNL is a successful technique for renal stone fragmentation. However, URS seemed more tolerated despite a lower stone-free rate. Level of evidence. 4. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 506
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A prospective multicenter European study on flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of renal stone
    Berardinelli, Francesco
    Proietti, Silvia
    Cindolo, Luca
    Pellegrini, Fabrizio
    Peschechera, Roberto
    Derek, Hennessey
    Dalpiaz, Orietta
    Schips, Luigi
    Giusti, Guido
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2016, 42 (03): : 479 - 486
  • [2] Management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy
    Bas, Okan
    Ozyuvali, Ekrem
    Aydogmus, Yasin
    Sener, Nevzat Can
    Dede, Onur
    Ozgun, Serhat
    Hizli, Fatih
    Senocak, Cagri
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    Basar, Halil
    Imamoglu, Abdurrahim
    UROLITHIASIS, 2015, 43 (02) : 155 - 161
  • [3] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a Cochrane Review
    Soderberg, Leah
    Ergun, Onuralp
    Ding, Maylynn
    Parker, Robin
    Borofsky, Michael
    Pais, Vernon
    Dahm, Philipp
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [4] The efficacy of flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi of 2 cm: A retrospective study
    Jiao, Binbin
    Lai, Shicong
    Xu, Xin
    Zhang, Meng
    Diao, Tongxiang
    Zhang, Guan
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (11)
  • [5] Retrospective study of visualized ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs. flexible ureterorenoscopy for nephrolithiasis patients with 1.5-2.5 cm kidney stones and without hydronephrosis
    Li, Z.
    Zhongying, Y.
    Hui, L.
    Hanrong, Z.
    Qinghe, G.
    Yuehong, Z.
    Jinyu, L.
    Meihong, L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (09) : 3185 - 3191
  • [6] A study to assess the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using "STONE" nephrolithometry score for staghorn renal stone
    Srinivasan, Santhosh
    Ambalath, Abdul Azeez
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2025, 36 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [7] The visual percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus the conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment for renal stone
    Zhang, Baochao
    Xie, Haijie
    Hu, Yude
    Liu, Chunyu
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (06) : 627 - 635
  • [8] CLINICAL STUDY AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF RENAL STONE BY PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
    Savsaviya, Jignesh
    Nagur, Basavaraj
    Biradar, Sangeeta
    Huddedar, Anil
    Chotai, Trishant
    Agrawal, Aman
    Keswarwi, Abhinav
    Gopendra, Ankur Das
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (66): : 4696 - 4698
  • [9] Management of calyceal diverticular calculi: a comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy
    Okan Bas
    Ekrem Ozyuvali
    Yasin Aydogmus
    Nevzat Can Sener
    Onur Dede
    Serhat Ozgun
    Fatih Hizli
    Cagri Senocak
    Omer Faruk Bozkurt
    Halil Basar
    Abdurrahim Imamoglu
    Urolithiasis, 2015, 43 : 155 - 161
  • [10] Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones
    Ergin, Giray
    Kirac, Mustafa
    Kopru, Burak
    Ebiloglu, Turgay
    Biri, Hasan
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 15 (06) : 313 - 317