Incorporating Breast Anatomy in Computational Phenotyping of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation

被引:11
作者
Gastounioti, Aimilia [1 ]
Hsieh, Meng-Kang [1 ]
Cohen, Eric [1 ]
Pantalone, Lauren [1 ]
Conant, Emily F. [1 ]
Kontos, Despina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; SELECTION; DENSITY; CURVES; IMAGES; MODEL; RAW;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-35929-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We retrospectively analyzed negative screening digital mammograms from 115 women who developed unilateral breast cancer at least one year later and 460 matched controls. Texture features were estimated in multiple breast regions defined by an anatomically-oriented polar grid, and were weighted by their position and underlying dense versus fatty tissue composition. Elastic net regression with cross-validation was performed and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate ability to predict breast cancer. We also compared our anatomy-augmented features to current state-of-the-art in which parenchymal texture was assessed without considering breast anatomy and evaluated the added value of the extracted features to breast density, body-mass-index (BMI) and age as baseline predictors. Our anatomy-augmented texture features resulted in higher discriminatory capacity (AUC = 0.63 vs. AUC = 0.59) when breast anatomy was not considered (p = 0.021), with dense tissue regions and the central breast quadrant being more heavily weighted. Texture also improved baseline models (from AUC = 0.62 to AUC= 0.67, p = 0.029). Our findings suggest that incorporating breast anatomy information could augment imaging markers of breast cancer risk with the potential to improve personalized breast cancer risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Breast Tissue Organisation and its Association with Breast Cancer Risk [J].
Ali, Maya Alsheh ;
Czene, Kamila ;
Eriksson, Louise ;
Hall, Per ;
Humphreys, Keith .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Breast Cancer Research, DOI DOI 10.1186/BCR2942
[3]  
Cawley GC, 2010, J MACH LEARN RES, V11, P2079
[4]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[5]   USE OF HOUGH TRANSFORMATION TO DETECT LINES AND CURVES IN PICTURES [J].
DUDA, RO ;
HART, PE .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1972, 15 (01) :11-&
[6]   Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations [J].
Gastounioti, Aimilia ;
Oustimov, Andrew ;
Keller, Brad M. ;
Pantelone, Lauren ;
Hsieh, Meng-Kang ;
Conant, Emily F. ;
Kontos, Despina .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (11) :5862-5877
[7]   Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment [J].
Gastounioti, Aimilia ;
Conant, Emily F. ;
Kontos, Despina .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 18
[8]  
Houssami N., 2016, JAMA ONCOLOGY
[9]   Physician and Patient Barriers to Breast Cancer Preventive Therapy [J].
Hum S. ;
Wu M. ;
Pruthi S. ;
Heisey R. .
Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2016, 8 (3) :158-164
[10]   A method to determine the mammographic regions that show early changes due to the development of breast cancer [J].
Karemore, Gopal ;
Nielsen, Mads ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Brandt, Sami S. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (22) :6759-6773