Is LNT anti-evolution dose response model?

被引：3

作者：

Calabrese, Edward J. ^{[1
]}

Agathokleous, Evgenios ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA

[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China

来源：

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY | 2022年 / 96卷 / 11期

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/s00204-022-03360-9

中图分类号：

R99 [毒物学（毒理学）];

学科分类号：

100405 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：3141 / 3142

页数：2

相关论文

共 6 条

[1] Dose response and risk assessment: Evolutionary foundations [J].

Calabrese, Edward J. ;

Shamoun, Dima Yazji ;

Agathokleous, Evgenios .

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2022, 309

[2] The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations [J].

Calabrese, Edward J. .

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2019, 301 :6-25

[3] Preconditioning is hormesis part II: How the conditioning dose mediates protection: Dose optimization within temporal and mechanistic frameworks [J].

Calabrese, Edward J. .

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 110 :265-275

[4] How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response [J].

Calabrese, Edward J. .

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 87 (12) :2063-2081

[5] Getting the dose-response wrong: why hormesis became marginalized and the threshold model accepted [J].

Calabrese, Edward J. .

ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2009, 83 (03) :227-247

[6] Thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis: What are animal experiments telling us? [J].

Waddell, WJ .

TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2003, 31 (03) :260-262