Development of a Framework for the Culture of Scientific Research

被引:10
作者
Dewey, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Roehrig, Gillian [1 ]
Schuchardt, Anita [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, STEM Educ Ctr, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Biol Teaching & Learning, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
SCIENCE-EDUCATION; RESEARCH EXPERIENCES; NORMS; VALUES; SOCIOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; SCHOOL; VIEWS; SUBSCRIPTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1187/cbe.21-02-0029
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Scientific research has a culture that can be challenging to enter. Different aspects of this culture may act as barriers or entry points for different people. Recognition of these barriers and entry points requires identifying aspects of the culture of scientific research and synthesizing them into a single, descriptive framework. A systematic literature review encompassing a two-pronged search strategy, descriptive mapping of ideas, and consensus building, was performed to identify aspects of scientific research culture. This resulted in the Culture of Scientific Research (CSR) Framework, composed of 31 cultural aspects categorized as either Practices, Norms/Expectations, or Values/Beliefs. Additional evidence of validity was collected through a survey that asked biological researchers to indicate which aspects in the framework were relevant to their experiences of research. The majority of survey respondents (n = 161) perceived the 31aspects in the CSR Framework as relevant to biological research. This framework provides a consistent structure for describing the experiences of people engaging with the culture of scientific research. The literature review included literature from multiple disciplines, so the CSR Framework should be broadly applicable. Future applications of the CSR Framework include identifying possible barriers and entry points experienced by groups currently underrepresented in scientific research.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Aikenhead G.S., 1996, STUD SCI EDUC, V26, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03057269608560077, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077]
[2]  
Aikenhead GS, 1999, J RES SCI TEACH, V36, P269, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-T
[4]   Race and Gender Differences in Undergraduate Research Mentoring Structures and Research Outcomes [J].
Aikens, Melissa L. ;
Robertson, Melissa M. ;
Sadselia, Sona ;
Watkins, Keiana ;
Evans, Mara ;
Runyon, Christopher R. ;
Eby, Lillian T. ;
Dolan, Erin L. .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2017, 16 (02)
[5]   A Social Capital Perspective on the Mentoring of Undergraduate Life Science Researchers: An Empirical Study of Undergraduate-Postgraduate-Faculty Triads [J].
Aikens, Melissa L. ;
Sadselia, Sona ;
Watkins, Keiana ;
Evans, Mara ;
Eby, Lillian T. ;
Dolan, Erin L. .
CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2016, 15 (02)
[6]   Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects [J].
Akkerman, Sanne F. ;
Bakker, Arthur .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 81 (02) :132-169
[7]  
Allchin D., 1999, Science Education, V8, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1008600230536, 10.1023/A:1008600230536]
[8]   Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research [J].
Anderson, Melissa S. ;
Ronning, Emily A. ;
De Vries, Raymond ;
Martinson, Brian C. .
JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2010, 81 (03) :366-+
[9]   THE GRADUATE STUDENT EXPERIENCE AND SUBSCRIPTION TO THE NORMS OF SCIENCE [J].
ANDERSON, MS ;
LOUIS, KS .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 35 (03) :273-299
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ENGAGING 6 CULTURES