Hidden Markov models for longitudinal comparisons

被引:56
作者
Scott, SL [1 ]
James, GM [1 ]
Sugar, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
health state model; hierarchical model; inhomogeneous hidden Markov model; k-means clustering; Markov chain Monte Carlo;
D O I
10.1198/016214504000001592
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Medical researchers interested in temporal, multivariate measurements of complex diseases have recently begun developing health state models, which divide the space of patient characteristics into medically distinct clusters. The current state of the art in health services research uses k-means clustering to form the health states and a first-order Markov chain to describe transitions between the states. This fitting procedure ignores information from temporally adjacent observations and prevents uncertainty from parameter estimation and cluster assignments from being incorporated into the analysis. A natural way to address these issues is to combine clustering and longitudinal analyses using a hidden Markov model. We fit hidden Markov models to longitudinal data using Bayesian methods that account for all of the uncertainty in the parameters, conditional only on the underlying correctness of the model. Potential lack of time homogeneity in the Markov chain is accounted for by embedding transition probabilities into a hierarchical model that provides Bayesian shrinkage across time. We illustrate this approach by developing a hidden Markov health state model for comparing the effectiveness of clozapine and haloperidol, two antipsychotic medications for schizophrenia. We find that clozapine outperforms haloperidol and identify the types of patients in whom clozapine's advantage is greatest and weakest. Finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of hidden Markov models in comparison with the current methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 369
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   A comparison of clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia [J].
Rosenheck, R ;
Cramer, J ;
Xu, WC ;
Thomas, J ;
Henderson, W ;
Frisman, L ;
Fye, C ;
Charney, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (12) :809-815
[22]   ESTIMATING DIMENSION OF A MODEL [J].
SCHWARZ, G .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1978, 6 (02) :461-464
[23]   Bayesian methods for hidden Markov models: Recursive computing in the 21st century [J].
Scott, SL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) :337-351
[24]  
Simpson G M, 1970, Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl, V212, P11
[25]   Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit [J].
Spiegelhalter, DJ ;
Best, NG ;
Carlin, BR ;
van der Linde, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2002, 64 :583-616
[26]   Dealing with label switching in mixture models [J].
Stephens, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2000, 62 :795-809
[27]  
Sugar CA, 1998, HEALTH SERV RES, V33, P911
[28]   Discrete state analysis for interpretation of data from clinical trials [J].
Sugar, CA ;
James, GM ;
Lenert, LA ;
Rosenheck, RA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (02) :183-196
[29]  
Whittaker J, 1990, GRAPHICAL MODELS APP
[30]  
Yang G. L., 2000, Springer Series in Statistics