Variation in clinical and patient-reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes

被引:15
作者
Flint, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Shah, Sanjiv J. [2 ]
Lewis, Eldrin F. [3 ]
Kao, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cardiol 111,Bldg F2,Room 143, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Feinberg Cardiovasc Res Inst,Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
来源
ESC HEART FAILURE | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HFpEF; Health status; Mortality; Hospitalization; Heart failure; CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; TOPCAT; SPIRONOLACTONE; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/ehf2.12660
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient-reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatment arm in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). Methods and results We analysed 1767 patients in TOPCAT from the Americas. Using 11 clinical variables, patients were classified according to six HFpEF phenotypes previously identified in the I-PRESERVE and CHARM-Preserved studies. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measured health status. All phenotypes showed increase in potassium with spironolactone, although only three phenotypes showed significant increase in creatinine, and two phenotypes showed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure. Rate of the TOPCAT primary outcome (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization) differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001) but not by treatment arm within each HFpEF phenotype. Baseline KCCQ score differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001), although some phenotypes with poor health status had lower rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome, and some phenotypes with better health status had higher rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome. However, within 3/6 phenotypes, higher baseline KCCQ score was associated with lower risk of the TOPCAT primary outcome. Change in KCCQ scores at 4 and 12 months did not differ among HFpEF phenotypes overall or by treatment arm. Conclusions Complex, data-driven HFpEF phenotypes differ according to biological response to spironolactone, baseline health status, and clinical endpoints. These differences may inform the design of targeted clinical trials focusing on improvement in outcomes most relevant for specific HFpEF phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 824
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics and Cause-specific Outcomes in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Kapelios, Chris J.
    Shahim, Bahira
    Lund, Lars H.
    Savarese, Gianluigi
    CARDIAC FAILURE REVIEW, 2023, 9
  • [42] Clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Lessons from epidemiological studies
    Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
    Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Miyuki
    Kinugawa, Shintaro
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [43] Redefining heart failure phenotypes based on ejection fraction
    Campbell, Ross T.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    McMurray, John J. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2018, 20 (12) : 1634 - 1635
  • [44] Prognostic value of echocardiography and ECG in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Cenkerova, K.
    Dubrava, J.
    Pokorna, V
    Kaluzay, J.
    Jurkovicova, O.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2016, 117 (07): : 407 - 412
  • [45] Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Japanese Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction - A Report From the Japanese Heart Failure Syndrome With Preserved Ejection Fraction (JASPER) Registry -
    Nagai, Toshiyuki
    Yoshikawa, Tsutomu
    Saito, Yoshihiko
    Takeishi, Yasuchika
    Yamamoto, Kazuhiro
    Ogawa, Hisao
    Anzai, Toshihisa
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 82 (06) : 1534 - +
  • [46] Trends in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Prevalence, Therapies, and Outcomes
    Steinberg, Benjamin A.
    Zhao, Xin
    Heidenreich, Paul A.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (01) : 65 - +
  • [47] Obese-Inflammatory Phenotypes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Sabbah, Michael S.
    Fayyaz, Ahmed U.
    de Denus, Simon
    Felker, G. Michael
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    Dasari, Surendra
    Carter, Rickey E.
    Redfield, Margaret M.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2020, 13 (08) : E006414
  • [48] Heart Failure With Preserved, Borderline, and Reduced Ejection Fraction 5-Year Outcomes
    Shah, Kevin S.
    Xu, Haolin
    Matsouaka, Roland A.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Heidenreich, Paul A.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Devore, Adam D.
    Yancy, Clyde W.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (20) : 2476 - 2486
  • [49] Predictors of patient-reported outcomes at discharge in patients with heart failure
    Rasmussen, Anne A.
    Johnsen, Soren P.
    Berg, Selina K.
    Rasmussen, Trine B.
    Borregaard, Britt
    Thrysoee, Lars
    Thorup, Charlotte B.
    Mols, Rikke E.
    Wiggers, Henrik
    Larsen, Signe H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2020, 19 (08) : 748 - 756
  • [50] Pharmacotherapy of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Basaraba, Jade E.
    Barry, Arden R.
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 35 (04): : 351 - 360