Variation in clinical and patient-reported outcomes among complex heart failure with preserved ejection fraction phenotypes

被引:15
作者
Flint, Kelsey M. [1 ]
Shah, Sanjiv J. [2 ]
Lewis, Eldrin F. [3 ]
Kao, David P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cardiol 111,Bldg F2,Room 143, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Feinberg Cardiovasc Res Inst,Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Div Cardiol, Sch Med, Aurora, CO USA
来源
ESC HEART FAILURE | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HFpEF; Health status; Mortality; Hospitalization; Heart failure; CITY CARDIOMYOPATHY QUESTIONNAIRE; TOPCAT; SPIRONOLACTONE; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/ehf2.12660
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The aim of this study is to use six previously described heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotypes to describe differences in (i) the biological response to spironolactone, (ii) clinical endpoints, and (iii) patient-reported health status by HFpEF phenotype and treatment arm in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). Methods and results We analysed 1767 patients in TOPCAT from the Americas. Using 11 clinical variables, patients were classified according to six HFpEF phenotypes previously identified in the I-PRESERVE and CHARM-Preserved studies. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measured health status. All phenotypes showed increase in potassium with spironolactone, although only three phenotypes showed significant increase in creatinine, and two phenotypes showed significant decrease in systolic blood pressure. Rate of the TOPCAT primary outcome (cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization) differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001) but not by treatment arm within each HFpEF phenotype. Baseline KCCQ score differed by HFpEF phenotype (P < 0.001), although some phenotypes with poor health status had lower rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome, and some phenotypes with better health status had higher rates of the TOPCAT primary outcome. However, within 3/6 phenotypes, higher baseline KCCQ score was associated with lower risk of the TOPCAT primary outcome. Change in KCCQ scores at 4 and 12 months did not differ among HFpEF phenotypes overall or by treatment arm. Conclusions Complex, data-driven HFpEF phenotypes differ according to biological response to spironolactone, baseline health status, and clinical endpoints. These differences may inform the design of targeted clinical trials focusing on improvement in outcomes most relevant for specific HFpEF phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 824
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin: From Patient Phenotypes to Clinical Events in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Bozkurt, Biykem
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2018, 7 (24):
  • [32] Curative effect analysis of urapidil on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
    Yuan, Xiao-Ye
    Ding, Cun-Tao
    Li, Jing
    Tan, Jing
    Wang, Yan-Ling
    Fan, Zhen-Xing
    He, Jing-Yu
    Yang, Wei
    Hua, Qi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (01): : 494 - 503
  • [33] Autoimmune Disorders in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Tada, Atsushi
    Doi, Shunichi
    Harada, Tomonari
    Ibe, Tatsuro
    Naser, Jwan A.
    Amdahl, Matthew
    Reddy, Yogesh N. V.
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2024, 12 (07) : 1257 - 1269
  • [34] Spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction
    Sanchez-Sanchez, C.
    Mendoza-Ruiz de Zuazu, H. F.
    Formiga, F.
    Manzano, L.
    Ceresuela, L. M.
    Carrera-Izquierdo, M.
    Gonzalez Franco, A.
    Epelde-Gonzalo, F.
    Cerqueiro-Gonzalez, J. M.
    Montero-Perez-Barquero, M.
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 2015, 215 (06): : 301 - 307
  • [35] Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Sorimachi, Hidemi
    Omote, Kazunori
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    HEART FAILURE CLINICS, 2021, 17 (03) : 483 - 498
  • [36] Clinical Update in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Krittanawong, Chayakrit
    Britt, William Michael
    Rizwan, Affan
    Siddiqui, Rehma
    Khawaja, Muzamil
    Khan, Rabisa
    Joolharzadeh, Pouya
    Newman, Noah
    Rivera, Mario Rodriguez
    Tang, W. H. Wilson
    CURRENT HEART FAILURE REPORTS, 2024, 21 (05) : 461 - 484
  • [37] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A clinical crisis
    Banerjee, Prithwish
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 204 : 198 - 199
  • [38] Outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a Southeast Asian cohort
    Hoong, Caroline Wei Shan
    Lim, Choon Pin
    Gao, Fei
    Chen, Qifeng
    Kawa, Leslie Bahn
    Ching, Chi Keong
    Sim, David Kheng Leng
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (09) : 583 - 590
  • [39] Heart failure with supranormal ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and outcomes compared to mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction
    Segev, Amitai
    Ishay, Rotem Tal-Ben
    Metra, Marco
    Maor, Elad
    Freimark, Dov
    Younis, Anan
    Beigel, Roy
    Matetzky, Shlomi
    Grupper, Avishay
    CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2025, : 665 - 675
  • [40] Phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and effect of spironolactone treatment
    Choy, Manting
    Liang, Weihao
    He, Jiangui
    Fu, Michael
    Dong, Yugang
    He, Xin
    Liu, Chen
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2022, 9 (04): : 2567 - 2575