Economically optimal nitrogen fertilization for yield and protein in hard red spring wheat

被引:37
作者
Baker, DA
Young, DL [1 ]
Huggins, DR
Pan, WL
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2004.0116
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This analysis determines profit-maximizing N fertilization levels of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) (Triticum aestivum L.) for various wheat prices, N prices, and protein-based HRSW price premium/ discount (P/D) structures for southeastern Washington data. Fertilizer response data consisting of rates of N fertilization (kg ha(-1)), grain yield (kg ha(-1)), and grain protein (g kg(-1)) were used to statistically estimate regression relationships that predicted yield and protein in response to N. Experiments were located near Pullman, WA (550 mm average annual precipitation). All predicted net return maximizing N, protein, and yield levels were within the data range. Increasing P/D incentives for protein increased optimal N, the expected economic result. At the high P/D structures, the P/D structure dominated N and wheat prices in determining optimal N application levels. Overall, net return-maximizing yields varied only modestly with changes in both N and wheat price in this data set. However, in all scenarios, as P/D incentives increased, net return-maximizing N levels were beyond the level that resulted in maximum yield. At the two lowest P/D structures, which provided the lowest reward for protein, it was most profitable to fertilize for slightly less than 140 g kg-1 expected protein. These results indicate that it is not always profitable to use 14% protein as an N fertilization goal.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 123
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BURNS JW, 2001, 022 WASH STAT U DEP
[2]   NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE, TRANSLOCATION, AND UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY OF WHEAT IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENT AND CULTIVAR YIELD AND PROTEIN-LEVELS [J].
CLARKE, JM ;
CAMPBELL, CA ;
CUTFORTH, HW ;
DEPAUW, RM ;
WINKLEMAN, GE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1990, 70 (04) :965-977
[3]  
HILL RC, 2001, UNDERGRADUATE ECONOM, P235
[4]  
Huggins D. R., 1991, THESIS WASHINGTON ST
[5]   NITROGEN EFFICIENCY COMPONENT ANALYSIS - AN EVALUATION OF CROPPING SYSTEM DIFFERENCES IN PRODUCTIVITY [J].
HUGGINS, DR ;
PAN, WL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (04) :898-905
[6]  
JANOSKY JS, 1999, THESIS WASHINGTON ST
[7]  
LEE BH, 1998, THESIS WASHINGTON ST
[8]   Quality as a factor in the optimal choice of fertilization and harvest date of meadow hay [J].
Norton, NA ;
Clark, RT ;
Reece, PE ;
Eskridge, KM .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1997, 10 (04) :551-557
[9]  
PAPENDICK RI, 1998, MISC0208 WASH STAT U
[10]   TILLAGE, SOIL DEPTH, AND PRECIPITATION EFFECTS ON WHEAT RESPONSE TO NITROGEN [J].
RASMUSSEN, PE ;
ROHDE, CR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1991, 55 (01) :121-124