Economic context and pigeons' risk-taking: an integrative approach

被引:10
作者
Goldshmidt, JN [1 ]
Fantino, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
budget; choice; delay reduction; pigeons; rate maximization; risk;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2003.08.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present work tested pigeons' (Columba livia) risk sensitivity to changes in resource availability in the concurrent-chains choice procedure. Subjects were provided choices, generally between variable-ratio (VR) and fixed-ratio (FR) outcome schedules with equal or different mean values. Predictions from ecology's risk sensitivity, behavioral economic's rate maximization, and psychology's delay-reduction theory were contrasted under settings where budget was adversely affected by one of three manipulations in seven experiments: (1) session length was dramatically reduced; (2) choice-phase duration was substantially increased by increasing the response requirements in the choice phase, or (3) outcome duration was significantly increased by increasing the response requirements in the outcome phase while holding session length constant. Although preference measures were sensitive to every budget manipulation, the nature of the changes observed were dependent upon the manner in which resource availability was manipulated and the choice alternatives offered. For example, choice was affected in an opposite manner when budget was adversely altered by lengthening choice duration ("search time") as opposed to lengthening outcome duration ("handling time"). Findings revealed partial support for pigeons' sensitivity both to changes in budget and to changes in conditioned reinforcer value. The overall pattern of results thus favors an integrative approach to describing the effect of economic context on general risk sensitivity. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 154
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding insiders: An analysis of risk-taking behavior
    Farahmand, Fariborz
    Spafford, Eugene H.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2013, 15 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [32] Bank monitoring and CEO risk-taking incentives
    Saunders, Anthony
    Song, Keke
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 88 : 225 - 240
  • [33] Target return as efficient driver of risk-taking
    D'Hondt, Catherine
    De Winne, Rudy
    Todorovic, Aleksandar
    REVIEW OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2024, 16 (01) : 130 - 166
  • [34] Trust and risk-taking in a pension investment setting
    Hauff, Jeanette Carlsson
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING, 2014, 32 (05) : 408 - 428
  • [35] Determinants of the sustainable internationalization and risk-taking factors in public commercial banks
    Ashfaq, Saleha
    Maqbool, Rashid
    Rashid, Yahya
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2022, 22 (04)
  • [36] On the reliability of the foreign language effect on risk-taking
    Hayakawa, Sayuri
    Lau, Becky Ka Ying
    Holtzmann, Sophie
    Costa, Albert
    Keysar, Boaz
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 72 (01) : 29 - 40
  • [37] Reviewing reviews of professionals' risk-taking decisions
    Carson, David
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2012, 34 (04) : 395 - 409
  • [38] Risk-taking attitudes among young drivers: The psychometric qualities and dimensionality of an instrument to measure young drivers' risk-taking attitudes
    Ulleberg, P
    Rundmo, T
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 43 (03) : 227 - 237
  • [39] Perceived Risk and Risk-taking Behavior During the Festival Firework
    Saadat, Soheil
    Naseripour, Masoud
    Karbakhsh, Mojgan
    Rahimi-Movaghar, Vafa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2010, 34 (05) : 525 - 531
  • [40] Experimental Evidence on Socioeconomic Differences in Risk-Taking and Risk Premiums*
    Li, Zheng
    ECONOMIC RECORD, 2020, 96 (313) : 140 - 152