Triple-bottom-line assessment of Sao Paulo state's sugarcane production based on a Brazilian multi-regional input-output matrix

被引:17
作者
Soto Veiga, Joao Paulo [1 ]
Malik, Arunima [2 ]
Lenzen, Manfred [2 ]
de Souza Ferreira Filho, Joaquim Bento [3 ]
Romanelli, Thiago Liborio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Biosyst Engn, Lab Syst Management & Sustainabil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, ISA, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Luiz de Queiroz Coll Agr, Dept Econ Business & Sociol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Biofuels; Land use change; Environment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LAND-USE CHANGES; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; GHG EMISSIONS; BIO-ETHANOL; ENERGY; BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; SUSTAINABILITY; EXPANSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.075
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sugarcane to biofuel is already a reality on the path to economy decarbonisation in Brazil, helping to mitigate global climate changes and reducing pressure on fossil fuel demand. To assess the sustainability performance of sugarcane biofuel production in Brazil, we utilised an extended multi-region input-output (MRIO) matrix to determine the multipliers of carbon emissions, primary energy use, labour, imports and economic stimulus, and their relationship to the Brazilian economic system. Furthermore, we performed a hybrid input-output (IO) life cycle assessment to analyse the triple bottom line (TBL) aspects of sugarcane production in Sao Paulo state. In particular, we appraised differences between land used for sugarcane or pasture, and between two distinct sugarcane production systems: 1) in which a mill purchases or rents an area and employs its own labourers and machinery (so-called owners), and 2) in which sugarcane is produced and directly sold by farmers to a mill (so-called suppliers). Our results suggest that if areas that were initially used as pasture for cattle are replaced to sugarcane production, energy consumption is increased by a factor of 3.7, employment is reduced by a factor of 5.4 and GHG emissions are reduced to only 2% for every monetary unit (R$) produced. Our assessments concerning Supplier-and Owner-sugarcane producers demonstrate that the total amount of imports required for both scenarios is similar. The owner scenario results in more direct full-time jobs in comparison to the Supplier scenario. For both scenarios, most of the employment is generated by the upstream sectors of their supply chains. Sugarcane production by suppliers uses less energy and produces less GHG emissions than sugarcane produced by owners.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 680
页数:15
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SUGARCANE ETHANOL BR
[2]  
[Anonymous], PRINC IND DO SET FER
[3]  
[Anonymous], NAT EN BAL YEAR BAS
[4]  
[Anonymous], CANASAT MON SUG
[5]  
[Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL GEN SYSTE
[6]  
[Anonymous], STAT YB AGR
[7]  
[Anonymous], SUSTAIN PRACT GUID M
[8]  
[Anonymous], SIST EST EM GAS EF E
[9]  
[Anonymous], GAS NAT BIOC
[10]  
[Anonymous], MATR INS PROD BRAS 2