Fate of the Retained Acetabular Component During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Hanif, Muhammad [1 ]
Wang, Chongyan [2 ]
Lim, Chin Tat [2 ]
Noor, Syed Shahid [3 ]
机构
[1] Dr Akbar Niazi Teaching Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1E Kent Ridge Rd,NUHS Tower Block,Level 11, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[3] Liaquat Natl Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
retained acetabular component; revision hip arthroplasty; meta-analysis; re-revision rate; aseptic loosening; FEMORAL COMPONENT; UNITED-STATES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; RETENTION; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.041
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to estimate re-revision rates due to aseptic loosening of retained acetabular components after revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until June 11, 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent investigators and consensus was reached with the involvement of a third investigator. Rates of re-revision due to aseptic loosening from 6 studies were aggregated using random effects model after a logit transformation and were grouped by study and population level characteristics. Results: An assessment of the re-revision rates of retained acetabular components due to aseptic loosening in revision total hip arthroplasty was reported in 6 studies involving 669 cases. The pooled rerevision rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval 8.4-18.4) with a mean study follow-up of 8.6 years. The rate of re-revision due to aseptic loosening of retained acetabular components was 6.8% (95% confidence interval 3.4-13.3). In the univariate meta-regression analysis, mean age at index revision surgery was significantly associated with the rate of re-revision due to aseptic loosening (R-2 = 99.98%, P<.0001). Conclusion: Based on this exploratory analysis, revision hip procedures with retentions of well-fixed acetabular components generally have a low risk of failure during mid-term to long-term follow-ups. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1136
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of modular versus monoblock stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daofeng Wang
    Hua Li
    Wupeng Zhang
    Huanyu Li
    Cheng Xu
    Wanheng Liu
    Jiantao Li
    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 24
  • [32] Change in CT-measured acetabular bone density following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Robertson, Thomas S.
    Pijls, Bart G.
    Munn, Zachary
    Solomon, L. Bogdan
    Nelissen, Rob G. H. H.
    Callary, Stuart A.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2023, 94 : 191 - 199
  • [33] Head, acetabular liner composition, and rate of revision and wear in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Merfort R.
    Maffulli N.
    Hofmann U.K.
    Hildebrand F.
    Simeone F.
    Eschweiler J.
    Migliorini F.
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [34] Hip Strengthening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review
    Daher, Mohammad
    Estephan, Michel
    Ghoul, Ali
    Tarchichi, Jean
    Mansour, Jad
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2024, 12 (05): : 373 - 379
  • [35] A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of antifibrinolytic agents in total hip arthroplasty
    Huang, Fei
    Wu, Yunfeng
    Yin, Zongsheng
    Ma, Guangwen
    Chang, Jun
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 25 (06) : 502 - 509
  • [36] Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Di Martino, Alberto
    Valtetsiotis, Konstantinos
    Rossomando, Valentino
    Brunello, Matteo
    Bordini, Barbara
    D'Agostino, Claudio
    Ruta, Federico
    Traina, Francesco
    Faldini, Cesare
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (08)
  • [37] The outcomes of conversion of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schmitz, Peter P.
    van Susante, Job L. C.
    Sierevelt, Inger N.
    Somford, Matthijs P.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (07) : 2993 - 3001
  • [38] Highly Porous Titanium Acetabular Components in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Kostretzis, Lazaros
    Greenberg, Alex
    Nikolaou, Vasileios S.
    Atrey, Amit
    Sculco, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06): : 1737 - 1749
  • [39] Peer review report 1 on "Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis"
    Emmanuel, Sam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 37 : S150 - S150
  • [40] An Analysis of Stably Fixed Femoral Components Retained During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Cho, Hyung Joon
    Han, Seung Beom
    Park, Jong Hoon
    Park, Sang Won
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (08): : 1239 - 1244