Fate of the Retained Acetabular Component During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

被引:3
|
作者
Hanif, Muhammad [1 ]
Wang, Chongyan [2 ]
Lim, Chin Tat [2 ]
Noor, Syed Shahid [3 ]
机构
[1] Dr Akbar Niazi Teaching Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1E Kent Ridge Rd,NUHS Tower Block,Level 11, Singapore 119228, Singapore
[3] Liaquat Natl Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2020年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
retained acetabular component; revision hip arthroplasty; meta-analysis; re-revision rate; aseptic loosening; FEMORAL COMPONENT; UNITED-STATES; OSTEOARTHRITIS; RETENTION; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2019.09.041
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to estimate re-revision rates due to aseptic loosening of retained acetabular components after revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched until June 11, 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent investigators and consensus was reached with the involvement of a third investigator. Rates of re-revision due to aseptic loosening from 6 studies were aggregated using random effects model after a logit transformation and were grouped by study and population level characteristics. Results: An assessment of the re-revision rates of retained acetabular components due to aseptic loosening in revision total hip arthroplasty was reported in 6 studies involving 669 cases. The pooled rerevision rate was 12.6% (95% confidence interval 8.4-18.4) with a mean study follow-up of 8.6 years. The rate of re-revision due to aseptic loosening of retained acetabular components was 6.8% (95% confidence interval 3.4-13.3). In the univariate meta-regression analysis, mean age at index revision surgery was significantly associated with the rate of re-revision due to aseptic loosening (R-2 = 99.98%, P<.0001). Conclusion: Based on this exploratory analysis, revision hip procedures with retentions of well-fixed acetabular components generally have a low risk of failure during mid-term to long-term follow-ups. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1136
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survivorship of the retained femoral component after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Hua
    Zhuang, Tengfeng
    Wu, Wenrui
    Gan, Wenyi
    Wu, Chongjie
    Peng, Sijun
    Huan, Songwei
    Liu, Ning
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [2] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Retained Acetabular Component
    Adelani, Muyibat A.
    Mall, Nathan A.
    Nyazee, Humaa
    Clohisy, John C.
    Barrack, Robert L.
    Nunley, Ryan M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (12): : 1015 - 1020
  • [3] Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty
    Beaulé, PE
    LeDuff, MJ
    Dorey, FJ
    Amstutz, HC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (12): : 2288 - 2293
  • [4] The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty
    Berger, RA
    Quigley, LR
    Jacobs, JJ
    Sheinkop, MB
    Rosenberg, AG
    Galante, JO
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (12): : 1682 - 1691
  • [5] One-Component Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Fate of the Retained Component
    Stathopoulos, Ioannis P.
    Lampropoulou-Adamidou, Kalliopi I.
    Vlamis, John A.
    Georgiades, George P.
    Hartofilakidis, George C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (10): : 2007 - 2012
  • [6] The Fate of Grafting Acetabular Defects During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Mall, Nathan A.
    Nunley, Ryan M.
    Smith, Kirk E.
    Maloney, William J.
    Clohisy, John C.
    Barrack, Robert L.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (12) : 3286 - 3294
  • [7] The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on acetabular component positioning and patient anatomy restoration during total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Changjiao
    Gao, Hong
    Ma, Qi
    Li, Huimin
    Zhang, Xiaofei
    Cai, Xu
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (37)
  • [8] Custom triflange acetabular components for large acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 1218 patients
    Broekhuis, Demien
    Tordoir, Rutger
    Vallinga, Zoe
    Schoones, Jan
    Pijls, Bart
    Nelissen, Rob
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2023, 8 (07) : 522 - 531
  • [9] Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Lele
    Yang, Yanjiang
    An, Biao
    Yang, Yantao
    Shi, Linyuan
    Han, Xiangzhen
    Gao, Shijun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 38 : 123 - 129
  • [10] Modular versus monoblock stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zampogna, Biagio
    Papalia, Giuseppe Francesco
    Parisi, Francesco Rosario
    Luciano, Claudia
    Zampoli, Andrea
    Vorini, Ferruccio
    Marongiu, Giuseppe
    Marinozzi, Andrea
    Farsetti, Pasquale
    Papalia, Rocco
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2023, 8