Tendential Autonomy and Conflict Containment in Nonstate Governance Mechanisms

被引:2
作者
Lawson, James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Polit Sci, Victoria, BC V8W 3R4, Canada
关键词
AUTOPOIESIS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00343.x
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Environmental certification programs have emerged and matured in many resource industries. Program autonomy is a central strategic problem in assessing program effectiveness and legitimacy. The article treats the problem of autonomy by drawing on Teubner's heuristic, strategic reconceptualization of Luhmann's conception of autopoiesis. Emergent autonomy can be inferred in different ways at different stages of program development. It is concretely expressed both in a distinct circularity in internal referral, deferral, and appeals procedures, and in institutional capacities to develop such procedures. Procedural circularity is often taken as evidence of program failure, but it may instead be an indicator of early strength. Periods of acute crisis are privileged circumstances for observing such capacities.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 426
页数:36
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS ECOLE POLYTEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], CAN AM PUBLIC POLICY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMM FUT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SOC NATUR RESOUR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMMODITY CHAINS GLO
[7]  
Arthurs Harry., 1996, U TORONTO LAW J, V46, P1
[8]   Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework [J].
Bernstein, Steven ;
Cashore, Benjamin .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2007, 1 (04) :347-371
[9]  
BOETEKESS G, 2000, FOREST STEWARDSHIP S
[10]   The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy [J].
Brans, M ;
Rossbach, S .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1997, 75 (03) :417-439