Performance improvement and patient safety program-guided quality improvement initiatives can significantly reduce computed tomography imaging in pediatric trauma patients

被引:15
作者
Connelly, Christopher R. [1 ]
Yonge, John D. [1 ]
Eastes, Lynn E. [1 ]
Bilyeu, Pamela E. [1 ]
Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp [1 ]
Schreiber, Martin A. [1 ]
Azarow, Kenneth S. [2 ]
Watters, Jennifer M. [1 ]
Jafri, Mubeen A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Div Trauma Crit Care & Acute Care Surg, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Div Pediat Surg, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Randall Childrens Hosp, Doernbecher Childrens Hosp, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
Cervical spine clearance in pediatric trauma; diagnostic imaging radiation exposure in pediatric patients; pediatric trauma; quality improvement protocols; CERVICAL-SPINE CLEARANCE; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; BLUNT TRAUMA; CANCER-RISK; CHILDREN; INJURY; CT; ASSOCIATION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001071
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality of cervical spine (C-spine) injury in pediatric trauma patients are high, necessitating quick and accurate diagnosis. Best practices emphasize minimizing radiation exposure through decreased reliance on computed tomography (CT), instead using clinical assessment, physical examination, and alternate imaging techniques. We implemented an institutional performance improvement and patient safety (PIPS) program initiative for C-spine clearance in 2010 because of high rates of CT scans among pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric trauma patients, aged 0 years to 14 years, in the pre- and post-PIPS implementation periods was conducted. Rates of C-spine CT, overall CT, other imaging modalities, radiation exposure, patient characteristics, and injury severity were compared, and compliance with PIPS protocol was reviewed. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and injury severity were similar before and after PIPS implementation. C-spine CT rates decreased significantly between groups (30% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), whereas C-spine plain x-ray rates increased significantly (7% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in C-spine magnetic resonance imaging between groups (12% vs. 10%, p = 0.11). In 2007, 71% of patients received a CT scan for any reason. However, the overall CT rate decreased significantly between groups (60% vs. 45%, p < 0.001). There was an estimated 22% decrease in lifetime attributable risk (LAR) for any cancer due to ionizing imaging exposure in males and 38% decrease in females between the pre- and post-PIPS groups. There was a 54% decrease in LAR for thyroid cancer in males and females between groups; 2014 compliance with the protocol was excellent (82-90% per quarter). CONCLUSIONS: Performance improvement and patient safety program-generated protocol can significantly decrease ionizing radiation exposure. We demonstrate that a simple protocol focused on C-spine imaging has high compliance, decreased C-spine CT scans, and decreased LAR for thyroid cancer. A secondary benefit is a reduction in total CT imaging, with an associated decrease in LAR for all cancers. Copyright (C) 2016WoltersKluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 284
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Cervical spine clearance after trauma in children [J].
Anderson, Richard C. E. ;
Scaife, Eric R. ;
Fenton, Stephen J. ;
Kan, Peter ;
Hansen, Kris W. ;
Brockmeyer, Douglas L. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 105 (05) :361-364
[2]   Radiation Exposure from Musculoskeletal Computerized Tomographic Scans [J].
Biswas, Debdut ;
Bible, Jesse E. ;
Bohan, Michael ;
Simpson, Andrew K. ;
Whang, Peter G. ;
Grauer, Jonathan N. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (08) :1882-1889
[3]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[4]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[5]  
Chodick Gabriel, 2009, Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, V7, P29
[6]   Trauma Association of Canada Pediatric Subcommittee National Pediatric Cervical Spine Evaluation Pathway: Consensus Guidelines [J].
Chung, Seen ;
Mikrogianakis, Angelo ;
Wales, Paul W. ;
Dirks, Peter ;
Shroff, Manohar ;
Singhal, Ash ;
Grant, Vincent ;
Hancock, B. J. ;
Creery, David ;
Atkinson, Jeff ;
St-Vil, Dickens ;
Crevier, Louis ;
Yanchar, Natalie ;
Hayashi, Allen ;
Mehta, Vivek ;
Carey, Timothy ;
Dhanani, Sonny ;
Siemens, Ron ;
Singh, Sheila ;
Price, Dave .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 70 (04) :873-884
[7]  
Colang John E, 2007, Radiol Technol, V79, P17
[8]   RadRAT: a radiation risk assessment tool for lifetime cancer risk projection [J].
de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington ;
Apostoaei, A. Iulian ;
Veiga, Lene H. S. ;
Rajaraman, Preetha ;
Thomas, Brian A. ;
Hoffman, F. Owen ;
Gilbert, Ethel ;
Land, Charles .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2012, 32 (03) :205-222
[9]   Image Gently Campaign Back to Basics Initiative: Ten Steps to Help Manage Radiation Dose in Pediatric Digital Radiography [J].
Don, Steven ;
MacDougall, Robert ;
Strauss, Keith ;
Moore, Quentin T. ;
Goske, Marilyn J. ;
Cohen, Mervyn ;
Herrmann, Tracy ;
John, Susan D. ;
Noble, Lauren ;
Morrison, Greg ;
Lehman, Lois ;
Whiting, Bruce R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (05) :W431-W436
[10]   Pediatric cervical spine trauma imaging: a practical approach [J].
Egloff, Alexia M. ;
Kadom, Nadja ;
Vezina, Gilbert ;
Bulas, Dorothy .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2009, 39 (05) :447-456